GTK is free of charge AND free for contributors in terms of license symmetry. You dont get that with Qt where you HAVE to assign your work(money, sweat and love for free software) to a comercial entity like Nokia. And Nokia equals Microsoft strategic partner and patent warmongering.
Well excuse me for being for free software and against foul play for evil vendors. bad-mouthing Microsoft, unfairness and patents is by no means trolling. It is simply the way it is around here.
Maybe this will surprise you, but I'd like to see them both dead.We don't have to worry about Qt much, because it will always stay Free and it can be always forked.
You're not for free software by attacking Qt. Thanks to Qt and KDE, Free Desktop environments are usable. There's also XFCE, but it doesn't have support it deserves. If you want to attack MS then support Qt, because it's something that stops pro MS mono.Well excuse me for being for free software and against foul play for evil vendors. bad-mouthing Microsoft, unfairness and patents is by no means trolling. It is simply the way it is around here.
KDE is unusable for me, it is "pretty and candy" but its unusable on debian based stuff. GTK is not crap, you are crap if you say so about free software, that you use everyday, and didnt even know you do.
maximum trolling?
i like QT, but i just dont like KDE, gnome is more usable for me, thats all, for troll is enough.
michael plz blow this troll away