Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 54

Thread: AMD Radeon HD 7970 On Linux

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,808

    Default AMD Radeon HD 7970 On Linux

    Phoronix: AMD Radeon HD 7970 On Linux

    You've may have heard or seen that AMD introduced the Radeon HD 7970 graphics card this morning as their first product built in their "Southern Islands" family and is based on their new GPU architecture, but how well does it work under Linux for the open-source and closed-source AMD Catalyst Linux drivers?..

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTAzMTk

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    Graphic card information and programming are revealed six months prior to launch, according to anandtech. Does than mean, that we could already be having working opensource driver? Why it is not the fact?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,404

    Default

    Anyone who's interested about this new architecture should check out the Anandtech article (not the benchmark one, the one previous to that). The article suggests that this is really the biggest architectural change at AMD since the R100 with the move away from VLIW to a more compute friendly design.
    Now, that is interesting for a few reasons.
    One, the OpenCL LLVM based compiler they released isn't too useful with the new design (but with the new design it seems as though the compiler becomes less important anyhow, so the compiler release was still a good thing).
    Two, and for me, the BIG ONE: hybrid video decode/encode. Apparently they've "copied" intel's ASIC for video decode/encode (though, it seems as though that was what UVD always was, but maybe UVD had more to do DRM?), but they're including a "hybrid" mode which offloads most of the work to the compute units (CU) and they leave some heavily serialised work to the UVD (again, I'm assuming DRM is included in that work). Thus is seems we might finally have some sort of video parity on the open source side with this new architecture (assuming, of course, they provide some help to driver developers to get the video decode/encode into a similar state as catalyst -- right now I can't imagine why they wouldn't as this doesn't seem like particularly valuable knowledge (ignoring any DRM/UVD issues), but perhaps Bridgeman can enlighten us?).

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,404

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crazycheese View Post
    Graphic card information and programming are revealed six months prior to launch, according to anandtech. Does than mean, that we could already be having working opensource driver? Why it is not the fact?
    From the anandtech article I would imagine the problem is just how different this new architecture is from everything before (on the AMD side at least). For at least this release, we need to have some patience.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by liam View Post
    From the anandtech article I would imagine the problem is just how different this new architecture is from everything before (on the AMD side at least). For at least this release, we need to have some patience.
    I donīt need. But if there would be no need for wait, I would be having amd instead.
    From hardware point of view, it looks like quite innovative(in terms of change from vliw), as well as polished on time arch; unlike bulldozer though, which was shame.

    If AMD takes their zero-core technology to APU and CPU, especially with bulldozer, that would be impressive addition.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,458

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crazycheese View Post
    Graphic card information and programming are revealed six months prior to launch, according to anandtech. Does than mean, that we could already be having working opensource driver? Why it is not the fact?
    I've never heard or seen that statement (internally or externally), and the only search engine hit I could find was this thread. Can you post a link to the statement ?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,458

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by liam View Post
    One, the OpenCL LLVM based compiler they released isn't too useful with the new design
    Actually quite the opposite.. the plan is for the new compiler code to go into the Gallium3D driver and process GCN graphics shaders (after adding GCN instruction generation, of course) along with compute for all architectures, while pre-GCN graphics shaders will go through the existing r600g compiler/translator.

    Quote Originally Posted by liam View Post
    this doesn't seem like particularly valuable knowledge (ignoring any DRM/UVD issues), but perhaps Bridgeman can enlighten us?).
    Agree 100%. The problem is that you can't ignore the DRM/UVD issues.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bridgman View Post
    I've never heard or seen that statement (internally or externally), and the only search engine hit I could find was this thread. Can you post a link to the statement ?
    Okay, this already means either I misunderstood anandtech, or anandtech misunderstood amd. Here, grep for "six".

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,458

    Default

    I read most of that article but didn't see the reference, and searching for "six" on the first page didn't give any matches. Was it supposed to be on the first page, or one of the later ones ?

    There are a lot of references to leaks of product information going back six months or so, but that's all I could find.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    22

    Default The 6 month reference

    @Bridgman and others looking for the 6 month cycle reference...I believe it's here:

    http://www.anandtech.com/show/5261/a...-7970-review/2

    "As a result both NVIDIA and AMD have begun revealing their architectures to developers roughly six months before the first products launch. This is very similar to how CPU launches are handled, where the basic principles of an architecture are publically disclosed months in advance".

    (the second page of the Anandtech review)
    ---

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •