Page 43 of 111 FirstFirst ... 3341424344455393 ... LastLast
Results 421 to 430 of 1109

Thread: "Ask ATI" dev thread

  1. #421
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,720

    Default

    how man r300 based pro cards with still valid support contracts are out there? if the number is 0 you know why it is not fixed.

  2. #422
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    197

    Default

    The only thing you guys should be using this thread for is consulting mental health. Its quite obvious there is a problem at ATi. Could be the water in the cafeteria? DONT DRINK THE WATER! IT WILL MAKE YOU DUMB!

  3. #423
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,720

    Default

    yes, there is a problem. Luckily not everybody is using wine. I don't wine, I don't have problems.

  4. #424
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sofia, Bulgaria
    Posts
    32

    Default

    OT:

    How much do THEY PAY YOU ? Is it enough to relieve your "non-open-community" soul ?

  5. #425
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    50

    Default

    Dear ati devs, do you have any plans on supporting hardware decoding on 780g? If yes, how soon is this gonna happen?

  6. #426
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    7

    Default

    The question was never answered about support for r3** cards. I have an 9600 M10- worked with catalyst 8.9 but nothing since. OSS drivers are getting there but still a far cry performance wise compared to fglrx. I am running ubuntu 8.10 so can't use the 8.9 drivers due to xorg/xserver versions. I have a laptop which is hard to change in terms of graphics hardware.

    The release notes clearly state 9600 mobility is supported, but installation suggests otherwise. Has r3** support been officially dropped?

    Thanks

  7. #427
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,386

    Default

    I didn't think we had changed anything w.r.t. R3xx/R4xx support. It's certainly possible that some ASICs got trimmed from the Ubuntu driver in order to meet schedule but I'm not aware of any general change in support.

  8. #428
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,607

    Default

    The problem with 8-9 to 8-11 is that you can not change res with nexuiz (from repository, I guess it would be the same with the sdl binary of the official package) on RV410. Try it and X will be corrupted until you kill nexuiz. I would not call say that nothing changed... beryl is not working too for Xorg 7.1.1 - it worked some time ago. fglrx drivers only get worse not better.

  9. #429
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    112

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bridgman View Post
    It's certainly possible that some ASICs got trimmed from the Ubuntu driver in order to meet schedule
    The official 8.11 installer has the exact same bug as well. So I doubt it has anything to do with the "Ubuntu Special Edition" of fglrx.

  10. #430
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,386

    Default

    Bug... ok, help me understand something. Are folks asking if we dropped 3xx/4xx from the driver because of something specific (removal of IDs etc..) or just because of a bug ?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •