I was just about to experiment with a few of these 'hidden' features, and ran a x11perf -aa10text and got really low values.
Code:
160000 reps @ 0.0322 msec ( 31100.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
160000 reps @ 0.0273 msec ( 36600.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
160000 reps @ 0.0273 msec ( 36700.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
160000 reps @ 0.0289 msec ( 34500.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
160000 reps @ 0.0289 msec ( 34600.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
800000 trep @ 0.0289 msec ( 34600.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
my xorg.conf is bare enough to be using pretty much all defaults:
Code:
Section "Device"
Identifier "aticonfig-Device[0]"
Driver "fglrx"
Option "XAANoOffscreenPixmaps" "true"
EndSection
This is on a 9500Pro btw. Going to restart with the new options now.
edit:
Code:
x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5
The X.Org Foundation server version 70200000 on :0.0
from valexia
Thu Dec 6 17:54:33 2007
Sync time adjustment is 0.0510 msecs.
1600000 reps @ 0.0028 msec (354000.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
1600000 reps @ 0.0032 msec (311000.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
1600000 reps @ 0.0031 msec (325000.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
1600000 reps @ 0.0027 msec (366000.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
1600000 reps @ 0.0027 msec (365000.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
8000000 trep @ 0.0029 msec (343000.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
Guess it makes the world of a differense, Though, to be honest, I'm not noticing any improvements in my windows though ...
How much of an effect do these options have however when using aiglx I wonder, i'm not using it yet, but one can wonder ...