Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: EXT4 Gains New Online Resize Support In Linux 3.3

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,396

    Default EXT4 Gains New Online Resize Support In Linux 3.3

    Phoronix: EXT4 Gains New Online Resize Support In Linux 3.3

    The EXT4 file-system pull request went in today for the Linux 3.3 kernel. The EXT4 updates for this next kernel include the new online resize interface...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTA0MDg

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    684

    Default

    impressive

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Russe, Bulgaria
    Posts
    539

    Default

    What is the purpouse of this resize?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    684

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Drago View Post
    What is the purpouse of this resize?
    So if you go and resize your ext4 partition it doesn't take as long...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1

    Default

    How come a 100GB resize is so much faster than a 20GB one?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts
    448

    Default

    Does this allow you to shrink it or just grow it? If it allows online shrinking then that's bloody fantastic. I doubt it somehow though. I don't know of any other filesystem that can do that off the top of my head.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    542

    Default

    I'm guessing this is about growing, not shrinking, especially with those stellar results (shrinking normally involves compacting data, so it will take a while).
    Nevertheless, very useful, especially on virtualized environments, where you can just "ask" for a bigger disk from a SAN, and online-grow the fs to use it.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    780

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Loblaw View Post
    How come a 100GB resize is so much faster than a 20GB one?
    By the magic of Michael only understanding half of the source before rephrasing everything and passing it off as an article. It's unfortunate, but often reading phoronix news is more productive if you find the external link and read that instead :/

    The first resize is from 20GB to 360GB (+340GB), the second from 100GB to 360GB (+260GB). And suddenly the numbers make sense!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,801

    Default

    Very bad article. It's the lowest quality writing I have ever seen in a Phoronix article.

    Michael, are you sick? No, I'm not trying to be funny. Your writing suggest there might be something wrong with you. You should go see a doctor.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    118

    Default

    This will be really useful in conjunction with LVM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •