Page 3 of 13 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 125

Thread: NVIDIA Talks Of Optimus Possibilities For Linux

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    183

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by birdie View Post
    Freedom not to successfully use for any real life work? I.e. freedom to work in text console?

    Linux is meant to be run on modern hardware. It looks to me Alan Cox and you have a different opinion.
    I think you really got something wrong there...


    Quote Originally Posted by darkbasic View Post
    No, it's sad having to use proprietary drivers.
    Nvidia, enjoy re-implementing the wheel.
    word

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    ฿ 16LDJ6Hrd1oN3nCoFL7BypHSEYL84ca1JR
    Posts
    965

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by birdie View Post
    Freedom not to successfully use for any real life work? I.e. freedom to work in text console?
    What real work would you need to do that is not possible without a proprietary driver? What exactly forces you to work in a text console?

    [QUOTE=birdie;248192]Linux is meant to be run on modern hardware. It looks to me Alan Cox and you have a different opinion.[/code]
    But linux is not meant to run with proprietary drivers. There's a reason that they "taint" the kernel.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    44

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by birdie View Post
    Freedom not to successfully use for any real life work? I.e. freedom to work in text console?
    Yes, and free to give that freedom up and install Windows if Linux is not your cup of tea.

    Linux is meant to be run on modern hardware. It looks to me Alan Cox and you have a different opinion.
    I can only speak for myself, but yes. Linux is not "supposed to run on modern hardware". It's supposed to run on hardware that it has support for. If the support is lacking, you should complain to the hardware manufacturer and not argue that Linux should give up the key thing that made it successful in the first place.

    Linux makes my life easier. Should I give that up because your hardware manufacturer isn't supporting your choice of operating system?

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    44

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Silverwing View Post
    Well.. I agree on that statement. I don't give a single fuck if I have to use closed source drivers. If Nvidia doesn't want to release open source drivers, so be it. They are responsible for their drivers and they are doing quite well except for the optimus functionality. Furthermore, I use Linux because it offers me freedom. Limiting me to not use close source drivers will limit my freedom. It limits me on playing games on Linux.

    I strongly support open source software, but I don't hate closed source software because it's closed source.
    That last bit of freedom you're asking for can be quite expensive. If we make life easier for binary blobs, the result will be more binary blobs. More binary blobs equals less freedom. So by asking for more you get less.

    I sometimes use closed source software as well, but I try very hard not to become dependent on it. Once you're stuck... you're stuck.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gururise View Post
    For whatever reason, the management at Nvidia will not allow this. I'd hope the kernel developers realize that not every company can, or is willing to, release OSS drivers for their product. If the kernel devs are going to object on moral grounds, why not remove support for binary blobs altogether?
    The Linux devs know you sometimes can't release OSS drivers, and that's why the option is there. If you port a driver (which is mostly the reason why you can't open source it) you can't really say it's derived from the Linux kernel because it already worked without it. Which is why the Nvidia blob is (probably) not a violation of the GPL. But that's as far as Linus (and probably most of the other devs) want to go.
    When you're going to use special Linux kernel features, and thus make a derivative work of it, you'll have to stick to the GPL just as everyone else.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    .ca
    Posts
    392

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Goderic View Post
    When you're going to use special Linux kernel features, and thus make a derivative work of it, you'll have to stick to the GPL just as everyone else.
    Indeed. And if we assume that it turns out most of the discussion here is moot. It's not about the personal taste of individuals, it's more of a legal requirement to reject this.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,908

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by birdie View Post
    Freedom not to successfully use for any real life work? I.e. freedom to work in text console?
    You are free to use Windows, MacOS, BSD, or any other operating system you like.

    Nobody is taking anything away from you. Leave the developers to license their code however the hell they want.

    Or write your own kernel.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,184

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by birdie View Post
    Should read as:
    Fuck Linux as a viable gaming platform. Fuck desktop Linux.
    We are quite content with semi-working dead slow open source drivers for ATI/NVIDIA (which don't support well power saving features thus no sane laptop user should ever use them).

    With such an attitude Linux will always have 1-1,5% market share. And don't even get me started on Stable API nonsense and lack of real backward libraries compatibility (it's just not there).
    This isn't a Windows or Haiku forum. I think you got lost..

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DanL View Post
    This isn't a Windows or Haiku forum. I think you got lost..
    I donīt think so.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    i hope they left nvidia in the dark. this anti open-source company should die.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •