Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Announcing The Lima Open-Source GPU Driver

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,624

    Default Announcing The Lima Open-Source GPU Driver

    Phoronix: Announcing The Lima Open-Source GPU Driver

    There's still one week until the work will be officially announced, but the open-source "Lima" open-source graphics driver project has surfaced...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTA0OTQ

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    MA, USA
    Posts
    1,485

    Default

    lima is also an anagram of mali, i'm not sure if the devs or anyone else noticed that.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts
    597

    Default

    Bugzilla really isn't the place for a pissing contest

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    338

    Default

    So is this project crap? Otherwise why can't the guys at fdo be professionals and accept this project?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    989

    Default

    Is the kernel piece going to be open source too, or are they trying to implement the _entire_ driver in userspace (except for using already-existing mainline Linux kernel components)?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,241

    Default Sounds like Reiser4

    Where it doesn't matter if the code is good or not if you can't get along with the project.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Nurnberg.
    Posts
    342

    Default

    Wow. _my_ friction...

    I really wonder how many project creation requests start off with Daniel asking whether a mailing list is really needed. Why else would one request a project unless to get a) git repositories b) a mailing list c) bugzilla. Asking whether a mailing list is really needed but not asking whether creating a separate project is really needed then seems quite off.

    Daniel has a long history of attacking radeonhd from the X.org/Fd.o side (there was this mailing list thing, there was him silently dropping radeonhd from the build script, and then it was of course his fd.o admin access that was used to hack/vandalize the long unused radeonhd repository), while not contributing much in code/software to the radeonhd versus radeon feud.

    I was hoping that after RadeonHD's rather disgusting climax, things would've changed at fd.o, that the same games would not be repeated. I could not have been more wrong, and i was very stupid to even try filing for a project at fd.o.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Posts
    857

    Default

    If I understand correctly, Daniel's question was not whether a mailing list is needed, but whether a separate mailing list specifically for that driver is needed.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Nurnberg.
    Posts
    342

    Default

    In the last year, daniels has not asked this question for any other project request. He has asked questions when some guys from Nokia's Meego (he used to work for that for a long time, but not until the point where Elop killed it) came and asked for a project, this until those guys gave up and went somewhere else. One project request from collabora was immediately created. Besides that, he created a few projects, without asking any noteworthy questions, in the usual timeframe. He even got briefly involved with the openchrome project request (i too was involved there, suggesting to james simmons to get a user account and use some user trees for his VIA playgrounds). In the end, openchrome, a project with little development and even less users (yes, i know, my unichrome work has even less users - i do not need to be told that), got both openchrome-devel and openchrome-users, and in the last 2 months, those mailing lists weren't used at all. In the last year, nobody was asked, not by daniels, not by anyone else, whether a mailing list really was necessary.

    One would also think that a guy like me, with all the experience i have in dealing with driver projects, would know whether or not a mailinglist is needed, and would definitely not ask for one (and only one!) lightly. I have quite a few playgrounds on people.fd.o for which i wouldn't even think of getting more infrastructure. Nobody else with fd.o admin access would have asked whether a mailing list really was necessary.

    That's one side of it. The other side is clearly documented in that bug. When we asked in 2007, and Egbert Eich asked the first question (he was one of the founding members of the current X.org and spent ages creating bylaws and did one of the first X.org releases after xfree86), we first got such a question back. When we then insisted, and stated that this mailinglist would see a lot of traffic quickly, he said "no, use xorg@". This was only the start of a very very nasty sequence of events.

    If anyone else had asked that, my answer would have been very different indeed. But nobody else did ask that. Nor would they have dreamt of doing so.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,673

    Default

    Can you tell me a widely used device using that gpu? I never heard of it before...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •