Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Nouveau Can Do OpenCL Compute For Open-Source NVIDIA

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,400

    Default Nouveau Can Do OpenCL Compute For Open-Source NVIDIA

    Phoronix: Nouveau Can Do OpenCL Compute For Open-Source NVIDIA

    There's another big accomplishment within the open-source graphics camp: Nouveau developers now having an initial working OpenCL implementation for NVIDIA GeForce graphics hardware on the driver that the Linux community developed themselves via reverse-engineering without NVIDIA's support...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTA1Mzk

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    139

    Default

    Why do so many of these articles include comments like "unfortunately this experimental and unfinished work isn't in the mainline tree" - feature branches exist for good reason, we don't want stuff like this in mainline until it is ready.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    .ca
    Posts
    406

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gigaplex View Post
    Why do so many of these articles include comments like "unfortunately this experimental and unfinished work isn't in the mainline tree" - feature branches exist for good reason, we don't want stuff like this in mainline until it is ready.
    Even worse, Michael will as usual pull an experimental branch, run PTS (<-so far so helpful), and then write a negative article complaining that it's buggy and unstable. And that there is no support for Kepler yet.

    And to add insult to injury, later link that article in the next negative one with 'the nouveau developers have other significant problems to worry about'. It's really aggravating, especially in the case of nouveau.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    338

    Default

    So does not having an LLVM --> TGSI backend being a significant problem imply that r600g will be able to run OpenCL soon? (Since Tom already published that bit.)

    Amazing work by the nouveau guys! Kodus for the LaTeX presentation!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts
    592

    Default

    The word you're looking for is schizophrenic. It's only a matter of time before Michael completely backtracks on all the good stuff in this article when telling us how slow / buggy the new experimental code is and how it doesn't work on a Geforce 2 card or something similar. Then of course he'll run something using the new experimental reclocking feature (hidden behind a kernel boot flag because it really isn't ready yet) and complain that it's faster but causes problems

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FireBurn View Post
    The word you're looking for is schizophrenic. It's only a matter of time before Michael completely backtracks on all the good stuff in this article when telling us how slow / buggy the new experimental code is and how it doesn't work on a Geforce 2 card or something similar. Then of course he'll run something using the new experimental reclocking feature (hidden behind a kernel boot flag because it really isn't ready yet) and complain that it's faster but causes problems
    Hey, this is Michaelīs "house", would you show some respect?!

    I see no connectivities between his approach, where Glisse correctly said this stuff is not in mainline for a reason, and you accusing him for being schizophrenic. Shizophrenics have divided personality - where is it?
    Phoronix is focused on newest technologies around opensource and graphics, I see nothing wrong in what he is doing!! He is doing it very good and no one is perfect.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •