Results 1 to 10 of 49

Thread: ARM On Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Battling Intel x86?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    13,419

    Default ARM On Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Battling Intel x86?

    Phoronix: ARM On Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Battling Intel x86?

    In recent weeks I have shown how Ubuntu 12.04 is ARM-ing up for better performance on the ARMv7 architecture by enabling hard-float builds and how the TI OMAP4 support has come together resulting in significant performance gains. Nevertheless, how is modern ARM hardware now comparing to the low-end Intel x86 competition? In this article are some results from Ubuntu 12.04 comparing the ARM performance to some Intel Core, Pentium, and Atom hardware.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=17078

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    42

    Default 1.2GHz?

    On the last page you mention that the ARM cpu is a dual-core 1.9GHz. It's actually 1.2GHz.

    The Tegra 3 results will be very interesting to see!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,196

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phoronix View Post
    Phoronix: ARM On Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Battling Intel x86?

    In recent weeks I have shown how Ubuntu 12.04 is ARM-ing up for better performance on the ARMv7 architecture by enabling hard-float builds and how the TI OMAP4 support has come together resulting in significant performance gains. Nevertheless, how is modern ARM hardware now comparing to the low-end Intel x86 competition? In this article are some results from Ubuntu 12.04 comparing the ARM performance to some Intel Core, Pentium, and Atom hardware.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=17078
    Obviously ffmpeg is not a great one to use b/c that has tons of x86 asm.http://arstechttp://arstechnica.com/...mment-22567953
    An interesting alternative would be some gstreamer pipelines that utilize ORC.
    That would make it fairly hardware agnostic while also testing the vector hardware.
    I'm really looking forward to Krait, Exynos 44xx+, and OMAP 5. Based on the dmips alone I would expect around a 30% increase of performance per Hz.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    106

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by liam View Post
    Obviously ffmpeg is not a great one to use b/c that has tons of x86 asm.
    FFmpeg also has a lot of ARM specific code. But indeed perhaps that particular case Phoronix tested is hitting a C-only path.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    6

    Default Atom N270

    The Atom N270 is single core but on the first page you write '2 Cores'.
    I saw you make this mistake in the previous articles too.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    52

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Milli View Post
    The Atom N270 is single core but on the first page you write '2 Cores'.
    I saw you make this mistake in the previous articles too.
    It isn't a mistake, it's Hyper-Threading.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts
    574

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nedanfor View Post
    It isn't a mistake, it's Hyper-Threading.
    Then it's the number of threads NOT the number of cores

    e.g. I have a quad-core i7 which has 8 threads

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •