Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: What Would You Like To See Out Of Mesa 8.1?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,410

    Default What Would You Like To See Out Of Mesa 8.1?

    Phoronix: What Would You Like To See Out Of Mesa 8.1?

    With nearly one month having passed since the release of the highly-anticipated Mesa 8.0, where have you come to realize not full satisfaction with this open-source graphics driver library? What would you like to see improved with the next release, Mesa 8.1?..

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTA2MzA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    316

    Default

    r300g:
    • Hyper-Z Enabled by default
    • MSAA

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    139

    Default

    r600g - better power management (runs ~10 degrees hotter than Windows while idling) plus fan speed control.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,024

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael
    Greater OpenGL 3/4 compatibility. While OpenGL 3.0 / GLSL 1.30 support is basically in place with Mesa 8.0, there's still several newer revisions to OpenGL and the OpenGL Shading Language to be addressed. By Mesa 8.1 it looks like Intel hopes to have a large portion of the OpenGL 3.1 specification covered.
    Saying that there's just several new revisions is really understating things. The differences between GL 3.0 and GL 2.1 were a lot smaller than the differences between GL 3.3 and 3.0, not to mention the differences between 4.2 and 3.0.

    GL 3.2 will likely be the hardest revision to implement due to the requirement for an entire new geometry pipeline stage. 4.0 will also be hard, but I have a feeling that the various changes necessary to make plugging in new stages will be done during the GS updates, so hopefully that transition will be easier.

    Personally, I'd like to see the DSA extension added to Mesa soon. It's available on both AMD's and NVIDIA's drivers, and it's really nice to have.

  5. #5

    Default

    I'd like to see:

    1) H.264 decoding implemented and working on r600 and newer hardware.
    2) Significant OpenGL performace improvements on r600 and newer hardware.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,212

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by elanthis View Post
    Saying that there's just several new revisions is really understating things. The differences between GL 3.0 and GL 2.1 were a lot smaller than the differences between GL 3.3 and 3.0, not to mention the differences between 4.2 and 3.0.
    No. 3.0-4.2 maybe, but 3.0-3.3 is much smaller.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    145

    Default

    +1 power management.

    While sitting in meetings my laptop is quite noticeably the loudest (even though we all have the same fleet of laptops) because the fans are running at 100%, even when idling.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    989

    Default

    * +1 for HD7000 support
    * Performance >= Catalyst for GL 2.1 ~ 3.3 workloads
    * Stereoscopic 3D support for HD7970
    * BluRay 3D playback support with hardware decoding

    Number of rolleyes = increasing levels of sarcasm / doubt that it'll happen (soon / if ever)

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by allquixotic View Post
    * +1 for HD7000 support
    * Performance >= Catalyst for GL 2.1 ~ 3.3 workloads
    * Stereoscopic 3D support for HD7970
    * BluRay 3D playback support with hardware decoding

    Number of rolleyes = increasing levels of sarcasm / doubt that it'll happen (soon / if ever)
    yes i also vote for hd7000 support and i vote for power managment.

    but i do not have hope for the catalyst... if you wana have openGL2ES performance in apps like KDE then install the radeon driver LOL! --.

    and the 3D stuff... there is a high chance that there is a new secret copy protection... and this means no you don't get opensource driver support for it.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    431

    Default

    Whatever happened to that DX10/11? Probably the one thing I'm hoping to see emerge.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •