Have Mesa's requirements "jumped the shark"?
Just tried to compile Mesa from git on Fedora 16, and was told that I needed 'xcb-dri2 version 1.8'.
So I download libxcb-1.8-2.fc17.src.rpm from Fedora's development repository and try to recompile it for F16, only to be told:
error: Failed build dependencies:
graphviz is needed by libxcb-1.8-2.fc16.i686
xcb-proto >= 1.6 is needed by libxcb-1.8-2.fc16.i686
xcb-proto I can understand, but what On Earth is "graphviz"? And WTF do I need it just to compile Mesa?
I have no idea what "graphviz" might demand before I can compile it, but its source RPM is 19M and so I'm guessing "humber_bridge.src.rpm", and possibly "hanging_gardens_of_babylon-2.0.src.rpm".
So it's not a Mesa requirement, but one from libxcb.
FWIW, graphviz is used for building graphs, needed by the documentation packages. I'm guessing you can disable building the docs, I also fail to see why you need to build graphviz itself from source.
Last edited by whizse; 03-05-2012 at 03:16 PM.
Because I'm trying to build RPMs from SRPMs.
This is an RPM-based system, so I'm trying to build F16-friendly RPMs using the SRPMs from F17. Experience teaches to rebuild these packages from source to avoid any incompatibility issues from running F17 binaries on an earlier system.
Yes, but doesn't it build with graphviz from F16? Are you planning on backporting the whole dependency chain?
Unfortunately, it does not.
I'm not planning of back-porting anything, but this package is certainly not building with F16's toolchain.
Originally Posted by whizse
Taking a source package from a newer distro release and recompiling it for an older system is basically what backporting is.