Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: NVIDIA Is Joining The Linux Foundation

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    13,467

    Default NVIDIA Is Joining The Linux Foundation

    Phoronix: NVIDIA Is Joining The Linux Foundation

    NVIDIA will be joining the Linux Foundation, per an announcement coming out in the morning. But for open-source Linux fans, will this be a reason to rejoice about NVIDIA potentially moving forward with open-source drivers? Don't break out the champagne quite yet...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTA2NzI

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    131

    Default

    Any devs want to chime in for a more realistic analysis?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    415

    Default

    My first reaction seeing the title in my RSS reader was; This is it, hell has frozen over. Reading the rest of the article though only re-confirmed what I've been remembering for years.

    nVidia doesn't care for linux. Their CEO once made a statement regarding linux back in the riva128 days about they would never support opensource etc etc.

    I think them joining the foundation is just a way to sell more tegra chips for use in android tablets, with their binary blob for video. Good for the foundation to have some extra cash, but don't expect any nVidia opensource miracles.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    158

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oliver View Post
    My first reaction seeing the title in my RSS reader was; This is it, hell has frozen over. Reading the rest of the article though only re-confirmed what I've been remembering for years.

    nVidia doesn't care for linux. Their CEO once made a statement regarding linux back in the riva128 days about they would never support opensource etc etc.

    I think them joining the foundation is just a way to sell more tegra chips for use in android tablets, with their binary blob for video. Good for the foundation to have some extra cash, but don't expect any nVidia opensource miracles.
    Previous generations of Android devices have used Tegra, but currently the reference platform is OMAP4.

    http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24...n-nexus-galaxy

    OMAP5 is shaping up as the future:

    http://9to5google.com/2012/01/13/tex...head-of-apple/

    IMO Nvidia need desperately to do something positive re Linux or Tegra won't be used any longer for Android. This is a big market to miss out on.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    415

    Default

    Only sad thing about the omap's is, they use our big bad friend, PowerVR.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    191

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oliver View Post
    Only sad thing about the omap's is, they use our big bad friend, PowerVR. :(
    and i don't even know who's worse...
    personally, i hope for Samsung and ARM to kick some ass with Exynos, Mali and Tizen.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dfx. View Post
    and i don't even know who's worse...
    personally, i hope for Samsung and ARM to kick some ass with Exynos, Mali and Tizen.
    Well ARM Mali 400 will have open-source graphics thanks to the Lima Project, not because ARM is awesome or anything; their driver is closed as well.

    Regarding NVIDIA, I hope the does mean they're going to start playing nice with Linux. The proprietary graphics drivers on my desktop are rubbish; my mobile Sandy Bridge graphics animate GNOME3 transitions orders of magnitude smoother than this damn Quadro FX 1800 (768 megs of freakin' RAM).
    Last edited by aorth; 03-07-2012 at 07:46 AM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    287

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aorth View Post
    Regarding NVIDIA, I hope the does mean they're going to start playing nice with Linux. The proprietary graphics drivers on my desktop are rubbish; my mobile Sandy Bridge graphics animate GNOME3 transitions orders of magnitude smoother than this damn Quadro FX 1800 (768 megs of freakin' RAM).
    <joking>OMG, such trolling is not accepted on the Phoronix forums, only complaining about Catalyst, the nVidia blob is to be considered perfect</joking>

    Now on a serious note, except for FSF all so called Linux or "Open Source" organizations are not really against binary blobs, so until you see the nVidia logo on http://www.fsf.org/patrons there's nothing to worry about .

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ansla View Post
    <joking>OMG, such trolling is not accepted on the Phoronix forums, only complaining about Catalyst, the nVidia blob is to be considered perfect</joking>

    Now on a serious note, except for FSF all so called Linux or "Open Source" organizations are not really against binary blobs, so until you see the nVidia logo on http://www.fsf.org/patrons there's nothing to worry about .
    Yeah, actually my post was missing the point. NVIDIA's Linux drivers suck; the fact that they're proprietary is irrelevant.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    135

    Default Open source

    An aside: I tend to buy NV over ATI because NV usually is quicker with Linux driver support I am not dragging out the "ATI makes crappy drivers" argument here: ATI makes fine drivers for Linux, but not always in a timely manner.

    My comment: NV can't open source it's drivers for the simple reason that doing so would give away many trade secrets about the structure of it's silicon. Same is true for AMD.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •