Results 1 to 10 of 36

Thread: Fedora Wants Your Help To Improve GNOME's Shell

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,369

    Default Fedora Wants Your Help To Improve GNOME's Shell

    Phoronix: Fedora Wants Your Help To Improve GNOME's Shell

    The Fedora Project is seeking your help to improve the GNOME Shell and its extensions...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTA3MDk

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    989

    Default

    My suggestion for improving Gnome Shell: use Cinnamon (or alternatively, merge Cinnamon's UI into the upstream Gnome Shell project).

    Since Gnome 2, my impression of the changes:

    GLib changes: Right on, great job, keep it up.
    GTK3 changes: Right on, great job, keep it up.
    GIO/GVFS/GSettings/GStreamer changes: Right on, great job, keep it up.
    Clutter / Mutter / WM changes: Right on, great job, keep it up.
    Using JavaScript as extension language: Right on, great job, keep it up.
    Default UI arrangement and usage patterns for Gnome Shell: FAIL. Unusable.
    Cinnamon: Right on, great job, keep it up.

    Something in that list isn't like the others...............

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    772

    Default

    I actually have no major complaints with Gnome Shell itself. I really was skeptical at first, but adjusted. The "hot corner" concept, in retrospect, seems like it's at least a decade overdue (insert rant here about how some Workbench hack actually did it first in 1988 in 22 bytes of 68K assembly language or whatever, but AFAIK Gnome 3 was the first major desktop to actually make it central). I just wish more GPU drivers sucked less at rendering it. The radeon driver has no egregious artifacts on my setup, but seems to eat CPU like candy if another app actually tries to render a big window at 60 fps. The fglrx driver is, as ever, brutally optimized for Maya and Unreal Engine 3 or whatever else is the hot shit these days.
    Last edited by Ex-Cyber; 03-14-2012 at 11:59 PM.

  4. #4

    Default

    "Unlike other distributions, the Fedora / Red Hat developers actively work towards pushing their changes back upstream, etc. "

    Wow, that's a bit harsh, Michael! I don't think we'd put it like that. Lots of other distros have very solid upstreaming policies too. I like to emphasize that contributing to Fedora test days helps upstream and other distros too, but I wouldn't put it in over-'competitive' terms like that, the same would be true of events for many other distros too I'm sure.

    I know it's hard, but it'd be great if people could avoid turning this into yet another 'GNOME 3 is great / GNOME 3 sucks' thread. This is a test day. Test days aren't about huge philosophical changes, they're about taking something and looking for specific bugs and fixing those. This is a test day to test out the Shell and particularly extensions currently in Fedora 17. If you really hate Shell, then by all means...don't come along. But it's not helping anyone to turn a discussion of this test day into an overall GNOME debate.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    80

    Default

    They should not forget there are desktop users of gnome 3 too, as they're trying to hide every menu or option out there for touch devices. But I'm a desktop/laptop user, I use a mouse and I want my bookmarks in a side panel in nautilus (for example).

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    342

    Default

    #1 Forget about tablets and other such touch devices. Create a whole new interface for those devices, instead of trying to butcher Gnome to fit that purpose.
    #2 Look at what Mint has done. A taskbar is a must.
    #3 Don't be afraid to make it work like Gnome 2.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    684

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alazar View Post
    They should not forget there are desktop users of gnome 3 too, as they're trying to hide every menu or option out there for touch devices. But I'm a desktop/laptop user, I use a mouse and I want my bookmarks in a side panel in nautilus (for example).
    Nautilus does have a sidebar in gnome 3 still, hell its still the default...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,259

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AdamW View Post
    I know it's hard, but it'd be great if people could avoid turning this into yet another 'GNOME 3 is great / GNOME 3 sucks' thread. This is a test day.
    What site do you think you're on? You should just be glad that Qaridarium hasn't (yet) posted some huge, annoying, 4chan-style retarded image in this thread.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    684

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DanL View Post
    What site do you think you're on? You should just be glad that Qaridarium hasn't (yet) posted some huge, annoying, 4chan-style retarded image in this thread.
    Last edited by bwat47; 03-21-2012 at 10:32 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    827

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ex-Cyber View Post
    I actually have no major complaints with Gnome Shell itself. I really was skeptical at first, but adjusted. The "hot corner" concept, in retrospect, seems like it's at least a decade overdue (insert rant here about how some Workbench hack actually did it first in 1988 in 22 bytes of 68K assembly language or whatever, but AFAIK Gnome 3 was the first major desktop to actually make it central).
    That isn't true at all. MacOSX has had hot-corners for years and years, and it's a feature that i have been using in OSX for longer than i can remember.... compiz also has had hot-corners (and hot-edges) for a very long time, as well. Both compiz and MacOSX allow you to customize hot-corners, with whatever function/use that are available.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •