Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: XWayland Updated Against X.Org Server 1.12

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,799

    Default XWayland Updated Against X.Org Server 1.12

    Phoronix: XWayland Updated Against X.Org Server 1.12

    Kristian Høgsberg has pushed updated patches this morning for XWayland in the X.Org Server that re-base this work to the X.Org Server 1.12 series. He's also updated the XWayland support for the xf86-video-intel graphics driver. XWayland is the effort for allowing an X.Org Server to run as a Wayland client...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTA3Nzg

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    101

    Default

    This is good. Much better than calling me and people like me 'tards, just because we regularly export DISPLAY across the network. I'm very happy with this report, much more so than with the PC-desktop-centric view espoused by many here.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,048

    Default Why?

    Quote Originally Posted by asdx View Post
    This is all nice and good but wake me up when something like KDE and Gnome is able to run on Wayland natively.
    Why natively, why not just under XWayland?
    As I understand, that would bring benefits too.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,103

    Default

    Someone guessed there may be a benefit due to simpler buffer swap handling. While on the other hand it's certain that it's one extra daemon, and one extra level of indirection.

    Make of that what you will.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    60

    Default No addtl abstraction for output

    Quote Originally Posted by curaga View Post
    Someone guessed there may be a benefit due to simpler buffer swap handling. While on the other hand it's certain that it's one extra daemon, and one extra level of indirection.

    Make of that what you will.
    Few complain that keyboard or mouse input is too slow. The concern is X's output. In that case, for fullscreen use of XWayland it actually writes directly to Wayland's output buffer preventing any additional copy. This combination makes it easy to test & improve Wayland

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    Can Wayland actually display the gfx application running under different user output on the screen of current user session.

    For example, I, from my current session, want to play opentransporttycoon as user "games". Xorg can handle that.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by snadrus View Post
    Few complain that keyboard or mouse input is too slow. The concern is X's output. In that case, for fullscreen use of XWayland it actually writes directly to Wayland's output buffer preventing any additional copy. This combination makes it easy to test & improve Wayland
    OK, let me complain about the mouse input being too slow. I run an OpenGL application that updates at 60 FPS and drag an object with the mouse. Result: obviously visible lag between the position of the mouse cursor and the object tracking it. This is not screen update lag, as I say it is 60 FPS, it is lag in receiving the mouse position change notification.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •