Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: X/Wayland Is Coming Along Nicely, But Work Is Left

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,080

    Default X/Wayland Is Coming Along Nicely, But Work Is Left

    Phoronix: X/Wayland Is Coming Along Nicely, But Work Is Left

    Keith Packard spoke on Wednesday of the 2012 Linux Foundation Collaboration concerning Wayland and its backwards compatibility support for X applications...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTA4MzA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    72

    Default can phoronix talk about the positive effect wayland will have for gaming on linux

    It will provide a more direct path to the rendering hardware instead of having to go through X. it just opens a display and puts up a GL context and pushes frames (i think)

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    353

    Default

    actually most problems with video in linux are not inherently because of x.org. they are because the driver's suck. but yeah, I want to go into time and see when linux desktop has a mature audio/video stack.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    100

    Default Compatibility

    Will wayland be FULLY backward-compatibile with X11, a drop-in replacement, or should we rather expect some degree of compatibility with well-behaved applications unless they rely on API x or depend on some behaviour of API y?
    I'm not a big fan of the throwing out of babies with the bath water that sometimes happens in the open source world.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    332

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by peppepz View Post
    Will wayland be FULLY backward-compatibile with X11, a drop-in replacement, or should we rather expect some degree of compatibility with well-behaved applications unless they rely on API x or depend on some behaviour of API y?
    I'm not a big fan of the throwing out of babies with the bath water that sometimes happens in the open source world.
    "legacy" applications will just run on the xserver which will run as a wayland client.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts
    589

    Default

    I'm a bit disappointed that Michael - a self proclaimed open source advocate - has an Iphone

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    492

    Default

    Wait just a second. Did you say iPhone?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,179

    Default

    Damn. If there was something to make sure even less people want Wayland it's making it depend on systemd.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,024

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FireBurn View Post
    I'm a bit disappointed that Michael - a self proclaimed open source advocate - has an Iphone
    He also has news about Unigine, Valve, and a boatload of other proprietary software.

    Open Source advocates generally prefer whatever software does the best job, believing that Open development processes produce better software. The iOS hardware and OS still beat the Android OS (which is also not fully Free) and other OSes hands-down (a bit subjective, yes, I admit), so even if Open Source is better in general, in the specific case of phone OSes the proprietary iOS may (again, somewhat subjectively) still be the better choice for real-world products.

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by elanthis View Post
    He also has news about Unigine, Valve, and a boatload of other proprietary software.

    Open Source advocates generally prefer whatever software does the best job, believing that Open development processes produce better software. The iOS hardware and OS still beat the Android OS (which is also not fully Free) and other OSes hands-down (a bit subjective, yes, I admit), so even if Open Source is better in general, in the specific case of phone OSes the proprietary iOS may (again, somewhat subjectively) still be the better choice for real-world products.
    What's the point of this comment while everything you have written is nothing, but a subjective opinion? It's very hard to imagine an iOS being better while it had huge problems in bringing multitasking which was present on Android. Michael is not only using iPhone, Mac, but also writes very often about Apple sponsored Clang/llvm. In the past there was even article written by some proprietary troll who was claiming proprietary and BSD licenses are better for Linux to succeed. This looks suspicious.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •