The CIA now wants the right to kill innocent.

[Qaridarium]

http://www.spiegel.de/politik/auslan...828497,00.html

like Terrorists the CIA now want the right to kill innocent people.

Al-Qaeda or CIA there is no difference both are in a holy war against the "innocent"

[Paul Frederick]

Because if I was in the CIA I'd be gunning for you! I'm not in the CIA and I still might take a pot shot in the general direction of a loser like you. Stay off my lawn!

[Qaridarium]

Because if I was in the CIA I'd be gunning for you! I'm not in the CIA and I still might take a pot shot in the general direction of a loser like you. Stay off my lawn!

LOL ? really the CIA killed million of innocent ! but in the past they "try" to not kill innocent...

now they want a killing license for innocent . really the CIA turn into a terror organisation if they get this "killing license"

[Paul Frederick]

LOL ? really the CIA killed million of innocent ! but in the past they "try" to not kill innocent...

now they want a killing license for innocent . really the CIA turn into a terror organisation if they get this "killing license"

If you are going to make outlandish claims you had better have a credible source in order to back them up. Heck the US army hasn't killed too many millions all told, innocent, or otherwise but you claim the CIA has? If this is the case then it should be well documented from trusted sources.

So far the only thing I see here dying by the millions is your brain cells, unless you can substantiate your ridiculous claims.

[crazycheese]

If you are going to make outlandish claims you had better have a credible source in order to back them up. Heck the US army hasn't killed too many millions all told, innocent, or otherwise but you claim the CIA has? If this is the case then it should be well documented from trusted sources.

So far the only thing I see here dying by the millions is your brain cells, unless you can substantiate your ridiculous claims.

Who gave Taliban weapons?

@Q, I think they have used this "rule" for ever since existance. I don´t know any state that cannot kill his citizens and get away with that. The only difference is that they are trying to legalize it, which means they are seeking a short (making something legal or covering it takes some effort) path to perform operations or remove undesireble evidence. This is actually military, but "shooting first and thinking later" was always an american way, no? :/

[Qaridarium]

Who gave Taliban weapons?

@Q, I think they have used this "rule" for ever since existance. I don´t know any state that cannot kill his citizens and get away with that. The only difference is that they are trying to legalize it, which means they are seeking a short (making something legal or covering it takes some effort) path to perform operations or remove undesireble evidence. This is actually military, but "shooting first and thinking later" was always an american way, no? :/

sure they do it all times. but try to legalize it is really the top of the "TOP"

this is really outrageous !

[steveriley]

Why would the CIA care now about killing Innocent? All 13 of those Popes died centuries ago

[Paul Frederick]

Who gave Taliban weapons? :/

So now you're going to fault the CIA for being generous are you? It isn't like they celebrate Christmas over there you know? So What is a few RPGs among friends around the holidays?

[Qaridarium]

If you are going to make outlandish claims you had better have a credible source in order to back them up. Heck the US army hasn't killed too many millions all told, innocent, or otherwise but you claim the CIA has? If this is the case then it should be well documented from trusted sources.

So far the only thing I see here dying by the millions is your brain cells, unless you can substantiate your ridiculous claims.

there is a documentation on you-tube for you: "Crimes of the CIA"



in generall wikipedia also helps: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central...y#Kontroversen

"The activities of the CIA have led to political controversy in the United States and other countries. The reason is primarily the proven massive interference in the internal affairs of other countries through covert operations, were also on the coups against democratically elected governments (see above). The long-standing support of dictators is criticized, especially in South America, such as Manuel Noriega in Panama and Somoza in Nicaragua, as well as the autocratic rulers of the Shah in Iran. It was also the former co-operation with former members of the Wehrmacht and the SS criticized as part of Operation Gladio, MK Ultra, or the partial support and connivance of the so-called rat lines, a legal escape routes for Nazi war criminals such as Klaus Barbie, escaped with the papers of the Vatican and the Red Cross to South America."

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gladio

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/MK-ULTRA

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Artischocke

"Human rights violations in the war on terrorism"

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central...en_Terrorismus

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murat_Kurnaz

"Drug trafficking and money laundering"

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central...eldw.C3.A4sche

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Cyclone

"CIA torture"

http://video.google.de/videoplay?doc...arch&plindex=0

""The CIA has the right to break any law""

http://www.zeit.de/2006/01/M__Scheuer

"Report on illegal CIA activities in Europe Part I"

http://assembly.coe.int/Main.asp?Lin...rtII-FINAL.htm
part 2
http://assembly.coe.int/Main.asp?Lin...rtII-FINAL.htm

[crazycheese]

So now you're going to fault the CIA for being generous are you? It isn't like they celebrate Christmas over there you know? So What is a few RPGs among friends around the holidays?

So, you did not answer the question - which means you agree. And asking question on question instead of giving answer is sign of cowardness. At least you could form that question a little more intelligent.

And in case you wish to invite me to your collective party with CIA, I kindly refuse.