watch my history in the phoronix forum i always write deep and long.
nothing special
im not naive because my question was only rhetorical
this means that i know that US elites know this.
but in fact these friends are not friends. because if the usa is weak just a micro second they will turn into a enemy.
real friends do not need anxiety and fear to be friends.
just ask the germans "do you have anxiety and fear against the USA?" i don't know a single german who answers this with "yes"
there are still us troops in germany and NO one do have fear because of this!... they are only happy if they come to a party.
now imagine this in Afghanistan ? (this is just a rhetorical question i know that you know that they are not happy about us soldiers running amok and kill innocent afgan childs)
sure a "dictatorship" in saudi arabia this is what the US people want for the world ? LOL (this is also a rhetorical question because i know that they claim otherwise.)
what about the american dream of democracy ?
LOL yes i know so many Germans hate the USA for the invasion. (this is rhetorical i don't know any)
sometimes it ends not in anti-americanism....
germany is the evidence against your theory.
but installing dictatorships in country only to get there oil cheap is the cause of anti-americanism
??? i do not unterstand your point here.
i think you are not right here USA only don't start a invasion if they calculate a "lose" in the battle.
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Challenge_2002
they only chose to invade iraq and Afghanistan because they lost the battle against iran in the "simulator"
"dictators and religious fundamentalism" doesn't matter the usa only fight wars they can win.
they work hard to fix the millennium challenge lose this means they install many short range weapons against small vessels and they installed many anti rocket guns to make sure they don't lost 80% of the fleet in the first 2 days.
be sure if they win the fight in the "simulator" they also use this option in real.
this part of my writing was about the iranian government.
the mainstream media use wrong translations.
if you do an translation in the orginal meaning then there is no "holocaust"
and you? you are the Iranian expert right ?
in my past i do have iranian classmate and i talk a lot with them!
and you think they lie to me if they tell me that the translation is wrong ?
the iranian classmate was also an exile Iranian means no big friend of muslim government in iran.
do the iran wana turn the USA into a muslim nation? YES! do the iran wana install a religious based kind of democracy like the one in iran? YES! do they want make a holocaust to kill them all? NO!
do they want to kill all jews in israel? NO! do they want turn israel into a muslim nation with a iran like religious democracy ? YES.
but the "Holocaust" argument is just wrong!
i don't talk about the peoples thinking i talk about the government..
they want turn us into muslims yes but they don't wana make a "holocaust"
i just make clear that Afghanistan is not a poor land of sand.
one is for sure kill 1 single enemy is better than start a big war... but they chose to do it "big"
why?
evil stuff you mean "kommunism=evil" LOL...
the cold war was complete nonsense.
the difference is: the same CIA is still there but the german schutzstaffel (SS) is not.
LOLmaybe ? the USA do have a bad PR company.
its a first step to make clear that the past was not what they want today.
i calculate a "good will" as "its fine now" because they are no "good will" in the past.
or do you call MK-Ultra a good will ?
successful denazification?



maybe ? the USA do have a bad PR company.
Reply With Quote