Page 16 of 25 FirstFirst ... 61415161718 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 160 of 243

Thread: AMD To Drop Radeon HD 2000/3000/4000 Catalyst Support

  1. #151
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,634

    Default

    When you look back to 9-3 that was the last fglrx driver with r300-r500 support. But you can still get a win driver for those. Most likely because win does not change the abi so often fglrx is weird in several ways, the fglrx devs do not even add community patches to allow usage of newer kernels, no they just keep the same code forever and require externa patches. Dropping support for hardware that is still sold is just one example, there much more where fglrx does not shine. fglrx supports ubuntu releases, thats clear because ubuntu always gets prereleases where others distros do not get those. 8.96 is in precise, all others have to use 8.96 from the opencl preview, but that lacks some pci ids in the beloved /etc/ati/control file. i mentioned often enough that that those checks using the control file and the same hardcoded pci ids in aticonfig is complete nonsense but nobody ever wants to change that. amd only fixes things which they are forced by ubuntu and if somebody else has got ideas what could be improved -> just ignore it.

  2. #152
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Creve Coeur, Missouri
    Posts
    399

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by locovaca View Post
    This is completely different than physically removing a driver from Catalyst. My read of that page is that Catalyst will support the 2k, 3k, and 4k series with the monthly driver release, but for months 2 and 3 there would be no changes for those particular cards. Should they continue the same model on Linux as Windows (which seems plausible given the sharing of code), there would be no change in the use of Catalyst other than the arms race for installing the latest driver once a month. And if they continue on Linux in this same regard, I would see no reason they wouldn't keep up with X.org/Kernel ABI updates. This smells like a lot of nothing.
    Actually, it is really simple. I asked the AMD Catalyst devs and they said they will NOT be updating to new kernels/xorg.

  3. #153

    Smile Nice

    It will stop putting off newbies (and hinder adoption of GNU/Linux distros).
    At most forums, fglrx figures prominently in a large number threads started by newbies.

  4. #154
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Toruń, Poland
    Posts
    160

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by amani View Post
    It will stop putting off newbies (and hinder adoption of GNU/Linux distros).
    At most forums, fglrx figures prominently in a large number threads started by newbies.
    There is a light of hope. Free driver is getting so good, that many "newbies" will never notice it.

  5. #155
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    130

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hirager View Post
    There is a light of hope. Free driver is getting so good, that many "newbies" will never notice it.
    Except when they get a popup asking if they would like to install a restricted driver for their graphics card... Question to Ubuntu based users - does ubuntu ask you if you want to install a restricted fglrx driver for your card if it won't actually work for the card you have? I.e. they do keep a DB of working/non-working cards for the current fglrx and the X.org & kernel for the current release?

  6. #156

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kamikaze View Post
    Question to Ubuntu based users - does ubuntu ask you if you want to install a restricted fglrx driver for your card if it won't actually work for the card you have?
    Except Optimus case, in most other cases answer is "no".

  7. #157
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Toruń, Poland
    Posts
    160

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kamikaze View Post
    Except when they get a popup asking if they would like to install a restricted driver for their graphics card... Question to Ubuntu based users - does ubuntu ask you if you want to install a restricted fglrx driver for your card if it won't actually work for the card you have? I.e. they do keep a DB of working/non-working cards for the current fglrx and the X.org & kernel for the current release?
    Ubuntu does it? Oh, yes, I forgot - I ditched it so long ago...

  8. #158
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    271

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RussianNeuroMancer View Post
    Except Optimus case, in most other cases answer is "no".
    Most likely they will go down the same route the Nvidia drivers do. If an older driver is still "supported" by Ubuntu and your card will work with it it'll still be recommended, so as long as 12.7 or whatever runs on 12.04 it'll get recommended for installation.

  9. #159
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,126

    Default

    The official comment for win8 is nice too: win8 will ship with the last supported hd2-4k driver, no downloadable win8 driver will support those cards. Find a bug? Tough luck.

  10. #160
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,726

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Qaridarium View Post
    Its interesting every time I do not write the same mainstream stuff like any other the people blame me to not write the same stuff like any others do.

    If you are not interested in different viewpoints or to be more specific in my viewpoint why not just put me on your ignore list ?

    Your writing do not have any argument to support your claim that Iím stupid "Q. is in full throttle stupid mode" but you are free to prove it to me.
    it is not about 'not mainstream stuff' but making up stupid shit, accusing others and smearing them. That is either:

    extremely stupid
    or
    extremely evil.

    So, you are not stupid but an evil bastard sailing close to a criminal offense?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •