Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 41

Thread: Blizzard's Diablo III On Linux?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,104

    Default Blizzard's Diablo III On Linux?

    Phoronix: Blizzard's Diablo III On Linux?

    In a recent gaming interview, Blizzard's director of the forthcoming Diablo III game was asked about a Linux client...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTA5Njk

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    16

    Default

    That linux port would have the only reason for me to buy it despite that stupid Battle.Net-enforced no-offline-gaming rule.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Old Europe
    Posts
    930

    Default

    So it’s like, well if we had the choice between getting PvP out earlier, or doing a Linux version, well PvP comes out earlier.
    That’s always what kind of ends up happening. Whenever anybody ever asks us “well why didn’t you do this thing?”,
    it’s, like, “well because we did this other awesome thing that we thought was more important”.
    Well, I guess this guy was simply not the right one to ask for a Linux client (as he says himself).
    What he says sounds like a manpower/prioritizing thing only, which is obviously not the most problematic thing.
    If they have/had a WoW Linux client and don't release it, then this clearly hints a strategic business decision.
    Most probably they simply don't care or see a benefit in providing a Linux client.
    Heck, they don't even release on consoles anymore.
    And this is where you could really make some additional money.

    Nevertheless, I'd really welcome a Diablo 3 Linux client.
    And I have to admit that I don't really care about the Battle.Net issues.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    118

    Default

    One of the most overrated companies out there. I'd might buy Diablo 3, but I doubt it.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    492

    Default

    It doesn't matter if Blizzard makes a Linux native client or not. I don't buy games that require a connection to play single player. Look how well that went for Starcraft2: people banned from playing single player campaign.
    Not to mention, beta players report single player is rather boring. But that may be strictly because of the scope of the beta.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    210

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bug77 View Post
    Starcraft2: people banned from playing single player campaign.
    really nice too see how blizzard cares about their users. I hope the hack comes out soon.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    702

    Default

    So where do we go to voice our demand for a native client?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    897

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bnolsen View Post
    really nice too see how blizzard cares about their users. I hope the hack comes out soon.
    Because anonymous anecdotal comments on the internet should always be taken as gospel.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    277

    Angry Blizzard looses more than i do.

    I don't loose money, they do.
    FU Blizzard.
    Market is there. You can't make up your mind - you don't get a cent from me.
    Other Linux guys - don't support them. Just because it works under wine - doesn't mean it's right.
    Wine sucks. Proven over and over again. Thanks devs for doing wine, but its work around, its not a solution.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    145

    Default

    Damn, that headline made my heart skip a beat!

    I still have love for Blizzard, mostly because of fond memories. Sure the no-LAN thing is a bummer, but I don't take it personally. In fact I'm setting up a hackintosh just for D3, so a native Linux client would mean a lot to me. If Blizzard and Valve were the only AAA game companies making games for Linux, I wouldn't ask for more (quality > quantity)

    What I don't get is the "if there is demand" position. Sure Linux desktop/gamers is a minority, but it's not like we are only 5 guys in a basement anymore. Take the Adobe CS for Linux poll as an example. I didn't vote (generally don't at these sort of things) and through my work with VFX and design companies I know that practically all of them would love the option to choose a Linux version, that's a lot of votes not counted. Still there are almost 13.000 votes. There are certainly that amount licenses that Adobe could sell to small/medium/large VFX houses around the world, and even if all only bought the "cheap" CS Design at ~$2000 that is $26 million! Don't tell me it would cost Adobe that much!

    Ok, so games don't cost $2000 but someone mentioned a good idea: Let Blizzard calculate how much it would cost X developers to port their engine to Linux, and start a Kickstarter project at that amount. I'm sure the demand is there!

    @Michael
    So... you have a lot of contacts in the industry, can't you set something up? Like a meeting with Blizzard and Gabe Newell? Or maybe get invited to Blizzards office?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •