Page 13 of 13 FirstFirst ... 3111213
Results 121 to 128 of 128

Thread: OpenBSD 5.1 Released

  1. #121
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    329

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kraftman View Post
    But you have probably much older GCC in OpenBSD, so it will be good to check the same version. Also, you may find answers here:

    http://www.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/...ny/teensy.html
    http://cs.mipt.ru/docs/comp/eng/os/l...f-howto-1.html
    I don't think older GCC will make it smaller. OpenBSD is not heavily optimised.

    Yes, I have found the answer: don't use libc and code in assembler!

  2. #122
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    329

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by darkcoder View Post
    You can try Arch. The only mayor shortcoming it had was the lack of package signing, but not anymore. While some people might argue about the occasional breakage rolling can bring, installing a server only once is priceless.
    I'm already using it. I don't think it is the best solution for server. It's rolling release is too fast.

  3. #123
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    329

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by darkcoder View Post
    *
    Not much old, KDE 3.5.10, which was released in August 2008. Nearly 4 years, but no, is not old.

    They don't even pickup Trinity which offers a fixed version of 3.5.x series (currently 3.5.13).
    Gnome is not that old, but have been unsupported for a while too (more than a year).

    One of the things I learned in school about security is to keep your software up to date. And surely they don't.
    Most OpenBSD users use other DE's. Also DE doesn't pose very high security threat.

  4. #124

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LightBit View Post
    I don't think older GCC will make it smaller. OpenBSD is not heavily optimised.

    Yes, I have found the answer: don't use libc and code in assembler!
    Don't use glibc may be the answer for you. If you care that much why don't you ask at glibc mailing list or irc?

  5. #125

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LightBit View Post
    I'm already using it. I don't think it is the best solution for server. It's rolling release is too fast.
    You'll probably be more comfortable with Debian, RHEL or Ubuntu, because they're not rolling releases and you don't have to pay as much attention when you upgrade system. In rolling releases configuration may change. I like Arch as much as Ubuntu, but I was just using it on desktop.

  6. #126
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    329

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kraftman View Post
    Don't use glibc may be the answer for you. If you care that much why don't you ask at glibc mailing list or irc?
    I didn't ask, glibc is bloated.

  7. #127

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LightBit View Post
    I didn't ask, glibc is bloated.
    It depends on your needs. In some cases it's not bloated at all and in some others it is.

  8. #128
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    57

    Lightbulb ...and OBSD 5.2 will be out 6 months after 5.1

    ... so that way, we can just cut-n-paste all of this same utterly "useless-immature-crap" from this thread, into that one.
    Last edited by scjet; 09-15-2012 at 03:07 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •