I did not test W8 that long to get used to Metro, it is also no real fun when your testsystem has got only a 1280x1024 tft and Metro wants 1366x768 to display more than 1 app the same time. If you try it on a system with less than 1024x768 then Metro apps do not start at all, so be sure that many netbook users will not upgrade If you see it only as start menu then this does not matter, it is not really a nice menu for mouse users, but you can use the keyboard to search. You should learn some keyboard shortcuts when you dont use a tablet anyway, using a mouse only is not optimal. I definitely prefer KDE but if you have to help others with win issues then you should know how it works as this will be the default soon.
What is really interesting are the hw requirements, UEFI for W8 logo could give a boost using that for Linux as well. On Linux there are really tricky things you can do with UEFI, i like the Linux stub support to boot it directly as boot option. I have got no fear about secure boot, most likely just a setup option far away. But: some boards (and more fun: laptops) are out there that can stop booting with just playing around with UEFI boot options. A cmos clear does not help at all now, as everything is stored in the eeprom now. I got a replacement bios chip for my asus z68 board recently as it stopped booting after changeing the boot order, but thats another story
Ah, now I know what the inspiration for Ubuntu is. I think the next Ubuntu will nail it and look *exactly* like Windows 8.
Do you think they like shooting themselves in the feet? If they're sane they shouldn't even look at it.
Originally Posted by RealNC
Thanks for clearing that up. Reminded myself how unfamiliar with Windows I am now by booting my Windows 7 machine yesterday and wondering why it took so long for something to happen when I clicked on an icon.
Originally Posted by Kano
Decent article, but lots of mention that "Metro is crap" without really explaining why.
1.) it's horrible looking
Originally Posted by Cyborg16
2.) it's clunky
3.) it's not as efficient as normal windowing system
4.) it will take major changes to improve it, changes people didn't want, don't want, since WinXP/NT
I use Kubuntu, so I can't discuss Unity changes.
Last edited by e8hffff; 05-04-2012 at 05:14 AM.
I just thought I'd share my own personal experiances with Win8 CTP too. I'm a dual-booter and I develop applications in C/C++ for Linux and (mostly) in C# for Windows. I also use both OSs very actively as a user, not just as a developer. So as a (partially) Windows developer, I of course wanted to get earlier experiences with the new OS than my users
From a user point of view, the only thing that set me back was also the Metro UI. I absolutely share my views with Michael here, the new UI is good for phones and tablets but a PITA for the desktop for me. I've also found myself often switching back and forth between the classic desktop and the Metro UI, which made the whole thing even worse. In case you're wondering, no, Metro and the classic desktop are not integrated with each other: You have to switch around using a special key combination if you actively use applications in both UIs, because Metro requires specially written applications to fully support it. You can also switch around using the mouse, but it took me literally minutes until I've finally found out how to go from Metro to my desktop. Anyway I'm surely going to avoid Metro as a user for now. On a separate note, I can second Windows 8's fast boot speed.
As a developer, I wasn't expecting many breaking changes since on Windows I'm mainly devloping in C#. Though as XP->Vista and .Net CLR2->CLR4 migrations have both shown on multiple occasions, it is still possible to break .Net apps on system updates. Anyway, Win8 CTP was a pleasant surprise in this respect, since this time I had zero problems "porting" (well I can hardly call it porting if I had nothing to do ). The only thing I had to adjust was one of my InnoSetup installers. Of course applications developed for earlier Windows systems will not integrate with Metro (for that you'd have to start your UI programming anew from scratch as a developer), but they at least seem to work flawlessly for the desktop mode of Win8. Not just with my own apps, I also had no problems installing and using other applications from the internet. So a plus here for MS for keeping good compatibility with Windows 7.
There is one thing though that I'd like to point out in Michaels article when he writes something like "Aside from some niche device areas and graphics drivers, the level of Linux hardware support is largely comparable to that of Windows." I wouldn't like to start a flame war here so I'm not going to elaborate on that (except if somebody explicitly asks me to), but I'd do like to mention that even though I'm a happy Linux user and all my HW works on Linux *currently*, I find Michaels original statement misleading.
Last edited by ultimA; 05-04-2012 at 05:39 AM.
anyone who had windows 8 installed tried to copy over around 10+ GB of data from one partition to another (or different harddrive) ?
when doing this with windows 7 all multi-tasking comes to a grinding halt
it may have been firefox' issue but I doubt that, would be interesting if they improved the i/o scheduler, too or again only some minor changes here and there and lots of publicity
at least next time I'll try it with chrome but I doubt that this would make a difference
You'd need to turn off standby image mode to test real boot modes, as the trick maybe to create a sleep/standby image when shutting down sot hat it just loads the image when booting. This is not a desirable mode for IT people as it can churn over faults into other sessions.