Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 36

Thread: A Look At Why Linux Graphics Drivers Have Issues

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    23

    Default

    Some 3D works in Kubuntu 12.04 but isn't accelerated. x1250 + xserver-xorg-video-radeon 1:6.14.99~git20111219.aacbd629-0ubuntu2

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,191

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by darkbasic View Post
    Intel is the most bugged, but I already knew it
    They are, of course, also the most used graphics by a big margin.
    Maybe there is a pattern here...

    The only problem I can recall having is that I've never been able to get video acceleration to work. Neither with Ironlake or SNB.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    647

    Default

    Posibly also that 8xx is now unsupported.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    371

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AJenbo View Post
    Posibly also that 8xx is now unsupported.
    It's still supported, actually. There are some fixes going into kernel 3.4 and SNA explicitly supports 8xx hardware. I know that for a while 8xx was only usable with shadowfb, but it's possible this has changed now. Though I don't have the hardware to actually test.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    647

    Default

    Hmm I'lll try and test it on 3.2 and possibly 3.3. There might actually be some devide with some 8xx being supported. Though I'm fairly sure it was droped from Xorg, so accelleraion (2D) might be limited.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    371

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AJenbo View Post
    Hmm I'lll try and test it on 3.2 and possibly 3.3. There might actually be some devide with some 8xx being supported. Though I'm fairly sure it was droped from Xorg, so accelleraion (2D) might be limited.
    The only thing that was dropped is DRI1 drivers from mesa, which are for 3D. But that doesn't affect 8xx, because it's supported by the DRI2 i915 driver. And even if it wasn't, you can compile DRI1 drivers from mesa-7.11 source and they'll work with mesa-8.x too, because the libgl interface is stable.

    Nothing was dropped from X. 2D accel is provided by UXA or SNA. And like I said, SNA explicitly supports 8xx. But it's not default yet, so make extra sure your xf86-video-intel is compiled with it. And use the latest version of course, which is 2.19

    Edit: When I talk about 8xx above, I mean Gen2 hardware. I mention this because there's also i810, which is Gen1.
    Last edited by Gusar; 05-10-2012 at 07:52 AM.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    53

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by russofris View Post
    Interesting chart. The article is short on analysis and meaningful hypothesis. The chart colors appear to have been chosen by a tetrachromat.
    Hahaha, a tetrachromat, I was thinking the exact same thing.

    The graphs on phoronix tend to have similar colours which makes then often really difficult to interpret.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    647

    Default

    Sorry your right it was of cause mesa and not Xorg that doped the DRI1 drivers. However not enabled by default and in -dev doesn't count as working in my book, but its good to see that it is being worked on
    Quote Originally Posted by Gusar View Post
    Edit: When I talk about 8xx above, I mean Gen2 hardware. I mention this because there's also i810, which is Gen1.
    Yeah that was the divide that i seamed to remember and the cards i was thinking about are i810. Do you know what my chances with this hardware going forwarded?

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    371

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AJenbo View Post
    Yeah that was the divide that i seamed to remember and the cards i was thinking about are i810. Do you know what my chances with this hardware going forwarded?
    Oh, you have an i810? I kinda wish I had that, just to play around with. As far as I know, this is the situation:

    - concerning modesetting, there's no KMS, but X should have the correct resolution. no idea about dual-screen, probably not supported
    - concerning 2D, there's only XAA, which is useless nowadays, so you're basically without acceleration. you do get Xv for video playback, at least that
    - concerning 3D, there is a kernel DRM module and a DRI1 driver. the intel manpage says only 16bit is supported, but no idea if even that still works
    Last edited by Gusar; 05-10-2012 at 12:21 PM.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    647

    Default

    Honestly i really don't care about 3D on a pre OGL 2.1 card. But KMS and possibly some 2D would be nice.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •