Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 51 to 58 of 58

Thread: green energy (Germany) beat nuclear energy(France) in cost effiency!

  1. #51

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 1c3d0g View Post
    Ugh...just let this pointless thread die. Nothing more of value can come out of it after being infected by Qaridarium.
    This thread is infected by Qaridarium ?
    This does postulate that the thread was not infected at start.
    Have you realized that this thread was started by Qaridarium?
    In other words a non-existent thread is more informative than a thread started by Qaridarium?

    You confuse people.

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,544

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by maldorordiscord View Post
    In other words a non-existent thread is more informative than a thread started by Qaridarium?
    Sounds like it's time for another poll

  3. #53

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bridgman View Post
    Sounds like it's time for another poll
    What kind of poll? Maybe a pool about deleting all posts and threads written by Qaridarium?
    That would be funny: 5,415 Qaridarium posts and more than 100 threads started by Qaridarium lost.
    I think it will cause the largest Phoronix earthquake in history.
    A new black hole will be born here in the forum after the database cleanup.

    Like black mesa in half life!!!!

    Maybe michael drink his next beer in this glass (BLACK MESA PINT GLASS (BLACK)):





    Maybe the Phoronix Valve steam story will end because of this forum accident.

    RIP world RIP valve RIP forum its all lost because of the "Qaridarium" black-hole in the forum.

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,544

    Default

    Poll question : "Is a non-existent thread is more informative than a thread started by Qaridarium?"

  5. #55

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bridgman View Post
    Poll question : "Is a non-existent thread is more informative than a thread started by Qaridarium?"
    Thats not fair you doubled the "is" to make it sound "wrong" to emulate a more "Qaridarium" style...
    That would be an unacceptable influence on the result!

    "Poll question : "Is a non-existent thread more informative than a thread started by Qaridarium?""

    The fixed version should be much more scientific correct.

    But to stay on the level of the forum members you should write the name like this: Qaridium like the original poll http://phoronix.com/forums/showthrea...light=Qaridium

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,544

    Default

    I agree with your fixed version.

  7. #57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bridgman View Post
    I agree with your fixed version.
    You mean this version : "Is a non-existent thread more informative than a thread started by Qaridium?"" right?
    Just to write correct inside of the "forum rule" the forum rule clearly point out that its not allowed to write the grammar wrong but its correct to write Qaridariums name wrong!

    Anyway the forum rule also point out that anyone who votes in this poll in a logical way get a ban-kick !!!!

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    3

    Default

    f a leftist / Green politician is your idea of a reliable source on nuclear power, then you are a lost case
    http://www.centplay.com/affiliate/id_139/

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •