This does postulate that the thread was not infected at start.
Have you realized that this thread was started by Qaridarium?
In other words a non-existent thread is more informative than a thread started by Qaridarium?
You confuse people.
That would be funny: 5,415 Qaridarium posts and more than 100 threads started by Qaridarium lost.
I think it will cause the largest Phoronix earthquake in history.
A new black hole will be born here in the forum after the database cleanup.
Like black mesa in half life!!!!
Maybe michael drink his next beer in this glass (BLACK MESA PINT GLASS (BLACK)):
Maybe the Phoronix Valve steam story will end because of this forum accident.
RIP world RIP valve RIP forum its all lost because of the "Qaridarium" black-hole in the forum.
Poll question : "Is a non-existent thread is more informative than a thread started by Qaridarium?"
That would be an unacceptable influence on the result!
"Poll question : "Is a non-existent thread more informative than a thread started by Qaridarium?""
The fixed version should be much more scientific correct.
But to stay on the level of the forum members you should write the name like this: Qaridium like the original poll http://phoronix.com/forums/showthrea...light=Qaridium
I agree with your fixed version.
Just to write correct inside of the "forum rule" the forum rule clearly point out that its not allowed to write the grammar wrong but its correct to write Qaridariums name wrong!
Anyway the forum rule also point out that anyone who votes in this poll in a logical way get a ban-kick !!!!