The v2 Rotary Interactivity Favor Scheduler

[elmariachi]

Please move to git instead, noone wants to use svn anymore.

+1 github is a good option imho

btw: on subjective use, RIFS is faster than BFS (I've been comparing both for the last three days). stuff like rendering pdf pages are faster and video plays smoother while compiling. I'll have to measure dropped frames to be sure though.

Chromium slows down sometimes (pseudo-freezes). I don't know if this is beeing caused by the scheduler (is chromium getting RR??) or by flash or by something else.

[3766691]

+1 github is a good option imho

btw: on subjective use, RIFS is faster than BFS (I've been comparing both for the last three days). stuff like rendering pdf pages are faster and video plays smoother while compiling. I'll have to measure dropped frames to be sure though.

Chromium slows down sometimes (pseudo-freezes). I don't know if this is beeing caused by the scheduler (is chromium getting RR??) or by flash or by something else.

Hi.
I m going to post RIFS-v3-RC5(Brain-Eating).
Chen

[3766691]

Latt result
[admin@localhost ~]$ latt tester

Parameters: min_wait=100ms, max_wait=500ms, clients=1
Entries logged: 108

Wakeup averages
-------------------------------------
Max 22 usec
Avg 8 usec
Stdev 2 usec
Stdev mean 0 usec

Work averages
-------------------------------------
Max 20326 usec
Avg 20016 usec
Stdev 85 usec
Stdev mean 8 usec
[admin@localhost ~]$
[admin@localhost ~]$

RIFS-V3-RC3(Brain-Eating), testing it with idle system.

[elmariachi]

Will you post in google-code or somewhere else?

[3766691]

Will you post in google-code or somewhere else?

I have post it on GoogleCode. Try
I have also make sure that all are usable on my GoogleCode download page

[3766691]

Will you post in google-code or somewhere else?

Also I am now doing benchmark to show which(V3-RC3-1, V3-RC3-2) work better.

[3766691]

+1 github is a good option imho

btw: on subjective use, RIFS is faster than BFS (I've been comparing both for the last three days). stuff like rendering pdf pages are faster and video plays smoother while compiling. I'll have to measure dropped frames to be sure though.

Chromium slows down sometimes (pseudo-freezes). I don't know if this is beeing caused by the scheduler (is chromium getting RR??) or by flash or by something else.

RIFS v3 is released.(Not rc anymore)
Also read linux mailing list as well.

[Diana]

Would you please decide whether we need
int preempt; <--- in struct task_struct in include/linux/sched.h
or if the corresponding sequence in check_timeslice_end in rifs.c
if(p->state != TASK_RUNNING)
p->prio --;
else
p->preempt = 0;
is correct. I'm no real programmer but I'm giving it a try with the first choice. (Now compiling :-) ) I hope that it's not the wrong choice. :-?

Best regards,
Diana

[3766691]

Would you please decide whether we need
int preempt; <--- in struct task_struct in include/linux/sched.h
or if the corresponding sequence in check_timeslice_end in rifs.c
if(p->state != TASK_RUNNING)
p->prio --;
else
p->preempt = 0;
is correct. I'm no real programmer but I'm giving it a try with the first choice. (Now compiling :-) ) I hope that it's not the wrong choice. :-?

Best regards,
Diana

Is it really V3?

[3766691]

Would you please decide whether we need
int preempt; <--- in struct task_struct in include/linux/sched.h
or if the corresponding sequence in check_timeslice_end in rifs.c
if(p->state != TASK_RUNNING)
p->prio --;
else
p->preempt = 0;
is correct. I'm no real programmer but I'm giving it a try with the first choice. (Now compiling :-) ) I hope that it's not the wrong choice. :-?

Best regards,
Diana

Sorry. It is my fault.(I have post a wrong patch.)
Now please wait for a moment , I am packing the correct one.