Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: NVIDIA GTX 680: Windows 7 vs. Ubuntu 12.04

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,787

    Default NVIDIA GTX 680: Windows 7 vs. Ubuntu 12.04

    Phoronix: NVIDIA GTX 680: Windows 7 vs. Ubuntu 12.04

    Following up on the performance comparison earlier this month of comparing Intel Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge graphics between Windows and Linux, up today are the results of a comparison of Windows 7 to Ubuntu 12.04 LTS when using a NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 "Kepler" graphics card.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=17350

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    677

    Default

    I'm surprised it did as well as it did - I had to use metacity because gaming performance was pretty well murdered by compiz in this release. Even better, the unredirecting pixmap option breaks compiz when enabled.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    134

    Default

    I'd like to see the same test results on a GeForce graphics card in the ~200 field.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    151

    Default

    While the performance seems to be comparable, I wonder how much performance improvement we'll see using Wayland. Will this push the linux graphics stack past windows? It'll be nice having a display server without all the X11 cruft that was based on 1980's graphics cards either way.

    Too bad Nvidia doesn't play to support the protocol... yet.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Toruń, Poland
    Posts
    160

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FourDMusic View Post
    While the performance seems to be comparable, I wonder how much performance improvement we'll see using Wayland. Will this push the linux graphics stack past windows? It'll be nice having a display server without all the X11 cruft that was based on 1980's graphics cards either way.

    Too bad Nvidia doesn't play to support the protocol... yet.
    There is one thing which can shatter this dream. The proprietary driver is already so detached from X, that removal of X could make no difference. Of course, the free drivers have more potential. Some old hardware already performs better than on Windows.
    Last edited by Hirager; 05-16-2012 at 08:28 AM. Reason: typo

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    159

    Default

    I'd be more interested in seeing the occasional comparison of the two doing something like running the Cycles renderer in Blender rather than these same few games each time. Unfortunately you can't really compare the AMD and NVIDIA cards (since Catalyst drivers have botched up OpenCL support), but you can compare like with like.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Israel
    Posts
    597

    Default

    ... And this with Unity 3D.

    Maybe in 2019 Phoronix will ceases to compare the slow(est) [1] WM [2] to Windows and OSX.
    *Sigh*

    - Gilboa
    [1]http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_desktop_managers1 &num=4
    [2] http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...desktops&num=2
    DEV: Intel S2600C0, 2xE52658V2, 32GB, 4x2TB, GTX780, F20/x86_64, Dell U2711.
    SRV: Intel S5520SC, 2xX5680, 36GB, 4x2TB, GTX550, F20/x86_64, Dell U2412..
    BACK: Tyan Tempest i5400XT, 2xE5335, 8GB, 3x1.5TB, 9800GTX, F20/x86-64.
    LAP: ASUS N56VJ, i7-3630QM, 16GB, 1TB, 635M, F20/x86_64.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hirager View Post
    There is one thing which can shatter this dream. The proprietary driver is already so detached from X, that removal of X could make no difference. Of course, the free drivers have more potential. Some old hardware already performs better than on Windows.
    X.Org isn't the reason 3D performance is poor on open source drivers anyways. Mesa is the problem with 3D graphics stack. X.Org does have some issues, like in events and input, things that make compositing difficult. Things like running multiple drivers at the same time, and GPGPU computing are difficult because of X. X.Org nor X11 impose any significant limitation on the performance 3D games.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    593

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gilboa View Post
    Maybe in 2019 Phoronix will ceases to compare the slow(est) [1] WM [2] to Windows and OSX.
    *Sigh*
    Ubuntu is the most popular desktop Linux distribution so comparing to it is only natural and it just happen to use Unity.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Madison, WI, USA
    Posts
    874

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by randomizer View Post
    since Catalyst drivers have botched up OpenCL support
    Care to explain? I've successfully used the Catalyst drivers + APPSDK for OpenCL development on both Windows 7 and Ubuntu (11.04 and 11.10 at least). Did they break something in the newest versions that I haven't heard about?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •