'fledging' is right... I forgot that they even EXIST.
Phoronix: Mandriva Linux Turned Over To The Community
As the latest path for the bumpy and long road of Mandrake/Mandriva Linux, the Mandriva Linux distribution has been turned over to the community...
http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTEwNDA
'fledging' is right... I forgot that they even EXIST.
"It''s dead, Jim."
Has it ever not been bumpy? I remember Mandrake practically begging its users back in 2002 when I started using it.
Back in 2002 they lead the coolness list on www.distrowatch.com
Still, their finances may have been different.Code:Rank Distribution H.P.D* 1 Mandrake 473 2 Red Hat 453 3 Gentoo 326 4 Debian 311 5 Sorcerer 253 6 SuSE 250 7 Slackware 216 8 Lycoris 209 9 Lindows 151 10 Xandros 123
i do feel bad for them but linux is a lot like evolution - its survival of the fittest. mandrake/mandriva, and even magea for that matter don't really offer anything compelling for their users to keep following them. i feel that way for about 90% of all distros out there. if it were up to me, the only desktop distros would be:
* barebone variations (in order of easiest to use to hardest): debian, arch, and gentoo, and maybe something like slackware
* ONE variant for each barebone shipping with GUI (mate, kde4, gnome3, xfce, lxde/openbox)
* And one variant of each of those that would come with many proprietary drivers or just anything to get newbs started
I don't have a problem with specialized distros such as ubuntu studio or parted magic, but even they are starting to become a little excessive. i also don't have a problem with the hardware specific distros or the experimental kinds. anyways, this would eventually come out to about 50 variants of distros, more or less, and even though that number seems pretty high, i'd say maybe only 5 of those would be very popular.
*tumbleweed*