Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: LLVM 3.1 Officially Released

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,115

    Default LLVM 3.1 Officially Released

    Phoronix: LLVM 3.1 Officially Released

    After a week-long hiatus, LLVM 3.1 has been officially released...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTEwNTM

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    109

    Default

    Interesting that Gentoo now has Tier 1 support (they are providing binaries for gentoo).

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts
    590

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scottishduck View Post
    Interesting that Gentoo now has Tier 1 support (they are providing binaries for gentoo).
    That seems a bit redundant seeing as any Gentooer worth their salt would be compiling for themselves anyway

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    22

    Default

    is there a debian repo for 3.1?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,185

    Default

    - still doesn't build by default with gcc (uses -fno-rtti even though it needs RTTI, bug present since 2.9 at least), requires Makefile hacking
    - still doesn't install the clang static analyzer, have to copy manually

    + this time no toolchain path hacking needed, it actually found the gcc/glibc init files

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Madison, WI, USA
    Posts
    877

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by curaga View Post
    - still doesn't build by default with gcc (uses -fno-rtti even though it needs RTTI, bug present since 2.9 at least), requires Makefile hacking
    - still doesn't install the clang static analyzer, have to copy manually

    + this time no toolchain path hacking needed, it actually found the gcc/glibc init files
    Hmm... I've had no problems doing a stock build (./configure && make && make install) of 3.1 branch checkouts of LLVM/Clang using gcc. Admittedly, I haven't tried with the released 3.1, so maybe they broke it again...

    System: Mint 12 x64

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    ฿ 16LDJ6Hrd1oN3nCoFL7BypHSEYL84ca1JR
    Posts
    1,052

    Default

    No problems with arch's llvm-svn package from AUR edited to build the final svn tag either but it is build with
    Code:
    make REQUIRES_RTTI=1
    so this could be relevant.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,185

    Default

    Yep, Gentoo does the same. That's exactly the issue I mean.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •