Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27

Thread: AMD Radeon Catalyst: Windows 7 vs. Ubuntu 12.04 LTS

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,643

    Default AMD Radeon Catalyst: Windows 7 vs. Ubuntu 12.04 LTS

    Phoronix: AMD Radeon Catalyst: Windows 7 vs. Ubuntu 12.04 LTS

    Now having compared the graphics driver performance between Microsoft Windows 7 and Ubuntu 12.04 Linux for the NVIDIA driver with the GeForce GTX 680 and the multi-platform Intel performance for Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge, here's a look at the AMD Catalyst driver performance with the Radeon HD 7950 graphics card when running between Windows 7 and Ubuntu Linux.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=17375

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    120

    Default And Ubuntu Studio low latency kernel?

    Ubuntu Studio is also LTE

    It has a low latency kernel

    Kernel that can be installed for testing

    MS WOS has a 300 Hz kernel, Ubuntu a 100 Hz one, and Ubuntu Studio a 1000 Hz

    As easy as:

    sudo apt-get install linux-headers-lowlatency
    sudo apt-get install linux-lowlatency
    sudo update-grub

    And of course use metacity instead of compiz for opengl benchmarks

    All of this was said last MS WOS vs Ubuntu benchmarks

    Why not improve this tests with this suggestions?

    My Linux gaming is better with low latency kernels, and with Sabayon, but that is other article, opengl gaming performance between Ubuntu, Arch, Sabayon and Suse or Fedora with high and low latency kernels.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    492

    Default

    That's rather impressive for AMD, Radeon used to lag significantly behind on Linux.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mitcoes View Post
    Why not improve this tests with this suggestions?
    There are literally thousands of variations that can be tested. Different kernels, compiler flags, window managers, distros, hardware, drivers...
    If you combine every variation you will and up with millions of tests. You want low latency kernels, a kwin dev wants tests with 4 different compositor backends each with 3 different configs...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Croatia
    Posts
    83

    Default

    I'm glad that AMD finally uped their game when it comes to gaming on Linux but theres a lot to be desired.Im also trying low latency kernel right now,...not playing well with kde.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    519

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by talvik View Post
    There are literally thousands of variations that can be tested. Different kernels, compiler flags, window managers, distros, hardware, drivers...
    If you combine every variation you will and up with millions of tests. You want low latency kernels, a kwin dev wants tests with 4 different compositor backends each with 3 different configs...
    Not to mention: how many poke around these options? I think this test is a fair "out-of-the-box" comparison. Which I guess is relevant for the intended audience of the benchmarked operating systems.
    Also, submitting results to OpenBenchmarking is available to anyone. Wanna see tweaked benchmarks? Roll up your sleeves and get to it.

    I second bug77's comment, I too would have thought the results would show a larger delta in windows' favor.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Sunshine State
    Posts
    303

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PsynoKhi0 View Post
    Not to mention: how many poke around these options? I think this test is a fair "out-of-the-box" comparison. Which I guess is relevant for the intended audience of the benchmarked operating systems.
    Also, submitting results to OpenBenchmarking is available to anyone. Wanna see tweaked benchmarks? Roll up your sleeves and get to it.

    I second bug77's comment, I too would have thought the results would show a larger delta in windows' favor.
    It is a fair "out of box" for Ubuntu users (which, granted, makes up a large part of Linux users), but that's not entirely fair considering the recent Phoronix article showing Unity and KDE being significantly slower (in visual performance) than Gnome3, XFE, & LXDE. Linux Mint is very popular and sports a distro of all three (Cinnamon instead of Gnome3) as do many others. So I would like to see out-of-the box visual benchmarks with a Linux system that's geared towards higher visual performance.

    I'm not sure why the author chooses to use Ubuntu over Arch or other build-it-yourself distros first (as a sort of peak performance case-senerio for Linux) and Ubuntu (with default settings) as a side comparison. Let people know what their machines are capable of with Linux, even if it requires a bit of tweaking or distro-switching to get there.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    150

    Default

    It would be nice with a Direct3D comparison for the Unigine benchmarks, just as a reference to compare the healthiness of the OpenGL performance.

    Otherwise, good work

    mitcoes:
    In your experience, how much does the low latency kernel impact the performance of different games/benchmarks?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    72

    Default

    @F i L

    Go to http://openbenchmarking.org/ and do that yourself. Its already been explained 100 times why he does it the way he does it.
    No matter what distribution he used or settings there would be more like you posting here crying he did not use a certain flag here
    or tweak a setting there. Its about default installs, and arch's default is the prompt.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    156

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soupbowl View Post
    @F i L

    Go to http://openbenchmarking.org/ and do that yourself.
    Are you going to pay him a windows7 license and/or the same hardware used in the test?
    I'm asking just to make some sense to your reply.

    Anyway, i still ask for benchmarks to be made without any WM and in fullscreen, even with the other default ubuntu configuration.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •