NetBSD 6.0 Is On Approach With New Features

[LightBit]

There are options for immediate write on both ext3 and 4. Not only that, but in every configuration I have ever known ext4 has a huge performance advantage over any version of UFS safe options or not.

"Fast & Furious 4"

No, it's not more likely on Linux. BSD file systems suck and ext2 sucks as well... Use Ext 3 or 4 with safe mount options. There is sync in ext4...

Where is sync http://kernel.org/doc/Documentation/...stems/ext4.txt?
Best you can do is commit=1.

All suck, but ext* suck more.

[LinuxID10T]

"Fast & Furious 4"


Where is sync http://kernel.org/doc/Documentation/...stems/ext4.txt?
Best you can do is commit=1.

All suck, but ext* suck more.

Run in journaled mode with forced syncs ever second if you want :P Seriously though guys, it seems as if Q has met his match at trolling.

[kraftman]

"Fast & Furious 4"

There are reason why Linux allows you to be fast and furious. In environments with backups and UPS you want the highest performance.

Where is sync http://kernel.org/doc/Documentation/...stems/ext4.txt?
Best you can do is commit=1.

All suck, but ext* suck more.

Ext rocks and BSD file system sucks. man mount:

the sync option today has effect only for ext2, ext3, fat, vfat and ufs

So you can use sync with ext2 and ext3. Ext4 has:

commit=nrsec (*) Ext4 can be told to sync all its data and metadata
every 'nrsec' seconds. The default value is 5 seconds.

[LightBit]

Most computers don't have UPS.
You can not set commit=0 (it will set to default).

[boulmostepumb]

Excellent written. Certainly not positive enough , but read on one breath

[boulmostepumb]

in Moscow, so the heat , and you still somehow have the strength to write ...