Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: DRM Changes In Linux 3.5 Are Huge

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,413

    Default DRM Changes In Linux 3.5 Are Huge

    Phoronix: DRM Changes In Linux 3.5 Are Huge

    This news item is coming a bit belated due to LinuxTag, but the DRM graphics driver pull went in last week for the Linux 3.5 kernel. The open-source kernel graphics driver changes this time around are absolutely huge, complete with three new KMS drivers...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTEwOTU

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    209

    Cool

    Wow, that is huge.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    989

    Default

    All awesome things, but the #1 thing keeping me from using open source graphics stack right now is not really that heavily related to the kernel (AFAIK there is plenty of kernel work to be done, but even more userspace work): RadeonSI

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    8

    Default Odd thing...

    Everytime there is some news about DRM I get a knot in my stomach...
    Last edited by bac0n; 05-30-2012 at 03:05 AM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts
    424

    Default

    It looks like we're gearing up for some interesting performance tests regarding BUF_PRIME and the likes. Is anybody using it yet?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts
    593

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Azpegath View Post
    It looks like we're gearing up for some interesting performance tests regarding BUF_PRIME and the likes. Is anybody using it yet?
    It's probably usable but not for any of the things we're wanting it for ie muxless laptops or crossfire

    It'll require a lot more work on the userspace side to work

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vilnius, Lithuania
    Posts
    2,636

    Default

    Awesome, perhaps now my Intel tablet PC will be able to run Linux with both native resolution and ACPI on!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    34

    Default

    Funny thing is, after my first card under Linux (an Oak OTI-067, which was just an unaccelerated framebuffer...), I used a Cirrus Logic 5429 for a while then a Cirrus Logic 5434 for a good long time. It was amusing to me once I started messing about with VMs, and was showing Cirrus Logic hardware.

    Probably a good choice though -- a 5434 supported bitblt (including from off-screen memory to the onscreen framebuffer), line fill, rectangle fill, and hardware cursor, and maybe color depth conversion.. which allowed a lot to be accelerated... and not much else, so there isn't a lot of state making the virtual card complicated to implement.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •