Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 42

Thread: AMD Catalyst 12.6 Beta improvements?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Salvador - Bahia - Brazil
    Posts
    79

    Default

    AMD took down 12.6 beta from the website.

    Is there anyone here that could provide us a link to it?

    Thanks

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by the-me View Post
    Hey guys,

    we (Debian) just wanted to upload the fixed xserver 1.12 driver to Debian, but yeah the x 1.12 support is....:

    Backtrace:
    0: /usr/bin/X (xorg_backtrace+0x34) [0x7fbbe05283c4]
    1: /usr/bin/X (0x7fbbe03a0000+0x18bf99) [0x7fbbe052bf99]
    2: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 (0x7fbbdf6c8000+0xf030)
    [0x7fbbdf6d7030]
    3: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpciaccess.so.0 (0x7fbbdf8e4000+0x5394)
    [0x7fbbdf8e9394]
    4: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so (0x7fbbdb7bb000+0x8032c9)
    [0x7fbbdbfbe2c9]
    5: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so
    (amd_xs112_int10_xf86ExtendedInitInt10+0xdd) [0x7fbbdbfbe05d]
    6: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so
    (amd_xs112_int10_xf86InitInt10+0xb) [0x7fbbdbfbd8fb]
    7: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so (xf86InitInt10+0xd)
    [0x7fbbdbb0397d]
    8: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so (0x7fbbdb7bb000+0x48405c)
    [0x7fbbdbc3f05c]
    9: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so
    (xdl_xs112_PreInitAdapter+0x274) [0x7fbbdbc3ec34]
    10: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so
    (xdl_xs112_atiddxPreInit+0x12ad) [0x7fbbdbc4031d]
    11: /usr/bin/X (InitOutput+0x83c) [0x7fbbe043287c]
    12: /usr/bin/X (0x7fbbe03a0000+0x4181d) [0x7fbbe03e181d]
    13: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (__libc_start_main+0xfd)
    [0x7fbbde3f1ead]
    14: /usr/bin/X (0x7fbbe03a0000+0x41cdd) [0x7fbbe03e1cdd]
    Segmentation fault at address 0xffffffffe18c7332

    ... simply not working at all (on amd64 only maybe?)..............
    Having the same issue. posted a bug report here

  3. #13
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    14

    Default

    So, they fix the 2d problem and leave hd4xxx users in the dust? nice.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    112

    Default

    It looks like AMD drop support for HD2k-4k in the same time, when he released the best drivers since last years...

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RussianNeuroMancer View Post
    Replace control file: http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Ubu...ware_Watermark
    And put valid signature to signature file: http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Amd_watermark
    Didn't work. I can't remove the watermark saying "AMD Testing use only".
    It seems that there is no signature inside the driver install script.

    Anybody managed to remove/hide it?

    Thanks

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RussianNeuroMancer View Post
    Replace control file: http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Ubu...ware_Watermark
    And put valid signature to signature file: http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Amd_watermark
    It doesn't work. The signature is "Undefined" in the signature file.

  7. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mikejuni View Post
    It doesn't work. The signature is "Undefined" in the signature file.
    That why you need to put valid signature follow instruction.
    Last edited by RussianNeuroMancer; 06-02-2012 at 12:47 AM.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RussianNeuroMancer View Post
    That why you need to put valid signature follow instruction.
    Further checked the signature from the grep command returns unsigned and the control file from install archive is the same as the installed one.

  9. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mikejuni View Post
    Further checked the signature from the grep command returns unsigned and the control file from install archive is the same as the installed one.
    Take control file and signature from stable build, not beta.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    38

    Default can confirm works well with Xserver 1.12 on Archlinux

    Quote Originally Posted by rechapit View Post
    Having the same issue. posted a bug report here
    here is my xorg.0.log... i just updated the packages after installing Catalyst 12.6 from the AUR....looks like debian specific issue to me

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •