Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 47

Thread: Radeon HD 7950 vs. GeForce GTX 680 On Linux

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nightmarex View Post
    Yeah maybe we don't need that kind of power on Linux... or Windows.... I for one think it's great that we can still get the info. BTW am I the only one who can't wait for AMD To stuff a 7950 into a APU?
    no you are not the only one i also wait for this. because then you do have unlimited VRAM because a hd7950 class hardware share the same 64bit ram adresses than the "CPU"

    right now with VLIW 5D and the new one VLIW4D the VRAM from the APU is exklusiv for the GPU means it just blocks the RAM and its limited to the blocked part of the ram.

    this will be the biggest improvement with the new architecture of the hd7970 in the APU in 2013.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    353

    Default

    You're right this time, Q. The APU's 3D cores are usually one generation behind. APU's with "6xxx" graphics in fact had an Evergreen (5xxx) based design, while the new Trinity marketed as 7xxx is in fact a Northern Islands (6xxx) based design. The display core however is not outdated in the Trinity APU (http://www.x.org/wiki/RadeonFeature#...splay_Hardware).

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dimko View Post
    What's the point of buying those cards if most GPU intensive games are 2-5 years of age?(X3 Reunion, ETQW, Heroes of Newerth, Oilrush)
    IIRC Oil Rush came out a few months ago. And IIRC Unigine is supposed to be a state-of-the-art 3D engine.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,295

    Default

    This one's a bit of a head-scratcher.

    The benchmarks done on other sites seemed to indicate that the 680 clearly performed better.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Posts
    790

    Default

    This is a nice review. I hope that we will see triple-monitor benchmarks from Phoronix one day.

    @johnc
    NVidia gives you faster performance on Windows. But that is partly due to their dynamic overclocking "GPU Boost", and at least their overclocking support on Linux used to be inferior to the Windows support.
    Another thing to keep in mind is that Phoronix compared retail cards. French site hardware.fr compared cards intended for reviewers and for retail from Nvidia, and found that the press sample was between 1.5 and 5% faster than the retail sample.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    4,725

    Default

    Yep, quite interesting that the results are the other way around compared to Windows.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,598

    Default

    Interesting are the heaven results, should be compared against dx11 and opengl4 on win...

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    142

    Default 7950 vs 680 ?

    This is not a proper test. Either put a 7970 against a 680 or a 7950 against 670.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AlbertP View Post
    You're right this time, Q. The APU's 3D cores are usually one generation behind. APU's with "6xxx" graphics in fact had an Evergreen (5xxx) based design, while the new Trinity marketed as 7xxx is in fact a Northern Islands (6xxx) based design. The display core however is not outdated in the Trinity APU (http://www.x.org/wiki/RadeonFeature#...splay_Hardware).
    hey yo know i have to much time to get all that stuff

    anyway trinity is a lame duck for linux opensource support
    because no HDMI support right now and no OpenCL support right now and "BAD means outdated" VLIW and bad defaults of gpu clock speed means slow and bad power manegment........

    for a opensource user i recommend hd7750+ hardware because the new architecture do in fact get more support from amd
    also the APU the opensource people waiting for are the NEXT one not the "trinity" one because of the 64bit memory managment with the same addressspace than the CPU. this means the linux kernel can use the VRAM from the GPU as RAM for CPU "tasks" and the other way arround

    also the new video engine "VCE" will be the one with Open-Source support and all UVD customers will be "Losers" because they will never get opensource support

    right now "Llano" and "Trinity" the amd APUs doesn't make sense for opensource users at all

    in my point of view this is a failure of the AMD-Opensource-managment (Bridgman)

    i can understand every "Intel Core i7-3770" customer because they get a APU with "Video acceleration support" and a working "Power-managment" and high performance "default"

    in 2013 amd will have the same but right now they just want to sell a high planed obsolescence rate with the name catalyst by dropping catalyst driver support for old drivers to burn your money away.

    and then in 2013 bridgman will claim this as his "victory" in improving the opensource support but his moves are very trivial a hamster would do the same for food.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    florida usa
    Posts
    79

    Default

    if i was bridgeman i would even ever respond to any forum post Q has been in. its like, whats the point.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •