Page 2 of 19 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 189

Thread: Petition to Ban Qaridarium

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    good example for banning people are stupid:

    Qaridarium:"i follow this and then i get this error message:
    ./hon-x86_64: error while loading shared libraries: libcurl.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
    and then i installed the libcurl3 package of my distro and now the nativ hon clind run.
    thank you very much
    but why is the HON linux support so bad that they don't fix this in there "installer" ? "

    Hirager "Go ask them. Actually, I would do it myself, but I am so lazy... Still on catalyst because of this laziness. "

    Qaridarium: "i'm banned in the HON linux-support-forum because i write about there bad linux support. "

    source: http://phoronix.com/forums/showthrea...-radeon-driver

  2. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Qaridarium View Post
    my forum tropics
    Is that an admission that your posts are flamebait?

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AnonymousCoward View Post
    No, more like:




    Btw....

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Connecticut,USA
    Posts
    941

    Default

    And here we go again, yet another "Ban Qaridarium" thread

    You guys are pretty funny

    So what if Michael makes Q a mod instead?
    Last edited by DeepDayze; 06-12-2012 at 03:40 PM.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    353

    Default

    Then we'll see Bridgman disappear anywhere soon. Which is sad, as he, despite the complaints of Q., tells us a lot about the driver development inside AMD. So what do we want, the existing situation to continue, Bridgman to disappear, or Q. to disappear? Right now nobody seems really content with the present situation.

    Edit. The internet was positive about Bridgman, but what about Q.? http://www.whatdoestheinternetthink.net/?s=qaridarium
    "It seems that the internet cannot decide what to make of Qaridarium"
    That's right. The people on the forum can't decide either. Which means the existing situation will continue.
    Last edited by AlbertP; 06-12-2012 at 04:03 PM.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Connecticut,USA
    Posts
    941

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AlbertP View Post
    Then we'll see Bridgman disappear anywhere soon. Which is sad, as he, despite the complaints of Q., tells us a lot about the driver development inside AMD. So what do we want, the existing situation to continue, Bridgman to disappear, or Q. to disappear? Right now nobody seems really content with the present situation.

    Edit. The internet was positive about Bridgman, but what about Q.? http://www.whatdoestheinternetthink.net/?s=qaridarium
    "It seems that the internet cannot decide what to make of Qaridarium"
    That's right. The people on the forum can't decide either. Which means the existing situation will continue.
    I don't see any problem with Bridgman at all and he's taken a lot of time to help people out and answer questions where he possibly can. without overstepping the bounds. if there's any issue with bridgman we'd have found that out a long time ago.

    As for Q, I find him to be a bit hyperactive at times to the point he's posting in broken German and English (Germlish) and maybe he needs to lay off the Monsters (if they have those over in Germany :-) )

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    714

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DeepDayze View Post
    So what if Michael makes Q a mod instead?
    Forum finally loses whatever lingering usefulness it may have had at one point.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,762

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RealNC View Post
    the phoronix forum prove that i write the same stuff before ever consuming LSD.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    4,729

    Default

    Right now nobody seems really content with the present situation.
    /me is quite content with the present situation. So what if Q and B have arguments about drivers, that's on-topic. Neither has done anything ban-worthy.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •