Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 35

Thread: An Optimized Open-Source Driver Tries To Compete With AMD Catalyst

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,128

    Default

    BTW, was the power profile default or high?

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    945

    Default

    Wow... that white text on cyan background is an all-time low readability record for Phoronix... what's up with the CGA colors?

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    ฿ 16LDJ6Hrd1oN3nCoFL7BypHSEYL84ca1JR
    Posts
    1,052

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Temar View Post
    I can't see where the optimized open source driver is trying to compete with the catalyst. The binary blob is still miles ahead.
    Yes, but if it has 60+ FPS for the applications you need competing (optimizing remaining "bottlenecks") is kind of pointless. That's competing enaugh for me.

    Quote Originally Posted by Temar View Post
    Video acceleration is also still a problem with the open source drivers. If at least that would work, the open source driver would be suitable for HTPCs.
    It would be definitely very good if it was supported for more video codecs, but what CPU does your HTPC have and what quality of videos do you want to play?

    Quote Originally Posted by Temar View Post
    In the current state however it is pretty much useless, except for desktop effects.
    Except for Playing Portal 2 in wine or all of the games in the humble bundles.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Ukraine
    Posts
    137

    Default

    Nice, results are very close to my.
    http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...BY-R600LLVM811
    hd6700
    Lightsmark 151 vs 178
    Nexuiz 88 vs 101
    Openarena 62 vs 77

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    378

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DanL View Post
    Yeah, I really don't need more 3D performance and I'm so tired of waiting for Gallium3D VDPAU
    Well,VDPAU via 3d shaders seems to work, just VDPAU via UVD isn't released:
    Code:
    [    12.045] (II) RADEON(0): [DRI2]   VDPAU driver: r600
    Code:
    # find /usr/lib64 | grep vdpau | grep r600
    /usr/lib64/vdpau/libvdpau_r600.so.1.0
    /usr/lib64/vdpau/libvdpau_r600.so
    /usr/lib64/vdpau/libvdpau_r600.so.1
    Code:
    ==========================================================================
    Öffne Videodecoder: [ffmpeg] FFmpeg's libavcodec codec family
    Ausgewählter Videocodec: [ffh264] vfm: ffmpeg (FFmpeg H.264)
    ==========================================================================
    ==========================================================================
    Öffne Audiodecoder: [ffmpeg] FFmpeg/libavcodec audio decoders
    AUDIO: 48000 Hz, 2 ch, s16le, 448.0 kbit/29.17% (ratio: 56000->192000)
    Ausgewählter Audiocodec: [ffac3] afm: ffmpeg (FFmpeg AC-3)
    ==========================================================================
    AO: [alsa] 48000Hz 2ch s16le (2 bytes per sample)
    Starte Wiedergabe...
    Film-Aspekt ist 2.35:1 - Vorskalierung zur Korrektur der Seitenverhältnisse.
    VO: [vdpau] 1920x816 => 1920x816 Planar YV12

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    681

    Default

    Taxi but the decoding runs on the cpu only mpeg2/1 is currently hardware accelerated.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,929

    Default

    Yes, it clearly says it's using ffmpeg's h.264 codec implementation, only the display part is done by the vdpau implementation, and that part works just as well with xvideo.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,277

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TAXI View Post
    Well,VDPAU via 3d shaders seems to work
    The last time I checked, it only supported mpeg 1 and 2.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,141

    Default

    it seems the biggest bottleneck roght now it is on the lack of shader packetizer and threading but the fixed functions seem pretty competitive right now wtih catalyst

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    164

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisXY View Post
    Yes, but if it has 60+ FPS for the applications you need competing (optimizing remaining "bottlenecks") is kind of pointless. That's competing enaugh for me.
    I wouldn't call it "remaining bottlenecks" as long as the binary blob is still 2-40 times faster.

    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisXY View Post
    It would be definitely very good if it was supported for more video codecs, but what CPU does your HTPC have and what quality of videos do you want to play?
    My HTPC has an AMD X2 4050e with an onboard AMD HD 3???. It is capable of playing Full-HD videos with the binary blob. However I'm currently using a NVidia GTX430, as XBMC or the Catalyst driver has/had problems with vba (got display errors with some hd-videos) and suspend-to-ram. I'm pretty much done with AMD, my next system will be an Intel Atom with a Nvidia chipset. Nvidia is just the only problem-free solution on Linux.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •