Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: 12-Core ARM Cluster Benchmarked Against Atom, Ivy Bridge, Fusion

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,686

    Default 12-Core ARM Cluster Benchmarked Against Atom, Ivy Bridge, Fusion

    Phoronix: 12-Core ARM Cluster Benchmarked Against Atom, Ivy Bridge, Fusion

    Last week I shared my plans to build a low-cost, 12-core, 30-watt ARMv7 cluster running Ubuntu Linux. The ARM cluster that is built around the PandaBoard ES development boards is now online and producing results... Quite surprising results actually for a low-power Cortex-A9 compute cluster. Results include performance-per-Watt comparisons to Intel Atom and Ivy Bridge processors along with AMD's Fusion APU.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=17473

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    709

    Default

    You should be able to get a lower power usage by using a single power converter rather than one for each.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    459

    Default

    "other planned optimizations include: investigating performance differences if using a high-speed NAS with NFS mount for the cluster rather than SDHC cards (e.g. using something like the Excito B3) or a USB-based SSD "

    why not just go and grab a freeNAS ISO and setup up NFS on any old PC you have around that boots a USB stick, or even try using ISCSI that works for me for the fastest Ethernet block Transfer, plus OC FreeNAS has MANY more file options you might want to also test this ARM cluster over...
    http://www.freenas.org/features/item...ategory_id=108
    Last edited by popper; 06-14-2012 at 07:38 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AJenbo View Post
    You should be able to get a lower power usage by using a single power converter rather than one for each.
    Exactly what I was thinking. Six transformers are going to perform a lot worse than one (assuming the boards can cope with the voltage droop). I'd actually be surprised if there wasn't a good multi-rail switching PSU designed for this very purpose.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    31

    Default

    I think though the power usage of both the atom 330 and the e350 is quite awful too (well the idle power but since most of the power is apparently idle power...) it should be possible to do quite a bit better with the right boards.
    That said if there's major performance gains with newer distro on the pandaboard that should boost efficiency too. In any case IVB will still blow it away :-).

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    5

    Default

    6 pandaboards mean:
    -6 switchmode power bricks (typically 85% efficient)
    -6 onboard switchmode power ICs (90%)
    -6 linear voltage regulators (60%)
    -6 wifi and bluetooth modules (did you turn these off?)
    -6 ethernet controllers (at least 200mW per port)
    -6 hdmi controllers
    -6 dvi controllers

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    32

    Default

    Ivy bridge is this year tech, Cortex A9 is 2 year old tech. This year technology for ARM is Cortex A15,

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    now we need this with 64bit ARMs and 1000 or better 10 000mbps rj45 copper based network adapter and then this shit rock da house

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    76

    Default Wrong...

    Quote Originally Posted by Popolon View Post
    Ivy bridge is this year tech, Cortex A9 is 2 year old tech. This year technology for ARM is Cortex A15,
    The Panda boards that are used in this demo are quite recent and represent the state of the art of what is available. A15 chips are great except for the fact that you can't actually buy them and they won't be out in volume until 2013... just in time to compete with Haswell. Oh, and A15 chips don't even support 64 bit execution modes. Those ARM chips won't be out until 2014 at the earliest.

    These benchmarks should be a massive wakeup call to anyone who thinks that ARM will just destroy Intel by slapping their chips into a notebook or a server. These benchmarks were a best-case scenario for ARM too... try running some FP intensive code or code that isn't perfectly parallel and the results would be even more skewed toward Ivy Bridge.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    459

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Popolon View Post
    Ivy bridge is this year tech, Cortex A9 is 2 year old tech. This year technology for ARM is Cortex A15,

    while that's true OC you will have to wait until around 3rd quarter for these Exynos 5 developer boards to appear in bulk it seems, hell its not even easy to find Samsung Exynos 4 Quad core 4212 (previously called 4412, and then finally renamed the Exynos Quad) 1.4GHz A9 with arm Midgard Mali T-604 Evaluation Boards yet.

    and even Dual core Exynos 4 are hard to find right now no matter the price never mind reasonable and full spec dev boards for the masses, you might finally get a reasonable priced Freescale MX 6 quad-core sometime this year from Genesi and their EFIKA MX range for ordinary devs but again that's A9 and no mainstream Gfx OC it would seem.
    Last edited by popper; 06-15-2012 at 11:51 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •