Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: NVIDIA Releases Its Stable 302 Driver w/ RandR 1.3

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,359

    Default NVIDIA Releases Its Stable 302 Driver w/ RandR 1.3

    Phoronix: NVIDIA Releases Its Stable 302 Driver w/ RandR 1.3

    Before calling it a week, NVIDIA Linux engineers released the 302.17 stable Linux driver. This is the first stable/certified Linux driver in the 302.xx series and thus the first that brings the long-awaited RandR 1.2/1.3 support...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTEyMDk

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    190

    Default

    woohoo, when does this baby pop up in the Ubuntu repos?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    765

    Default

    Anyone knowledgeable as to why Wayland doesn't need stuff like RandR?
    Afaik it's true but dunno why.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    159

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mark45 View Post
    Anyone knowledgeable as to why Wayland doesn't need stuff like RandR?
    Afaik it's true but dunno why.
    RandR is an extension to X. It is directly part of X. So that means RandR would obviously not work with Wayland as Randr is part of the X11 protocoll while wayland is it's own protocoll. Wayland implements it's own routines for doing what RandR does in X.

    It's like asking: "Why is my Hondas steering wheel not part of your Toyota?"

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    765

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ragas View Post
    RandR is an extension to X. It is directly part of X. So that means RandR would obviously not work with Wayland as Randr is part of the X11 protocoll while wayland is it's own protocoll. Wayland implements it's own routines for doing what RandR does in X.

    It's like asking: "Why is my Hondas steering wheel not part of your Toyota?"
    That's not my question.
    My question was, to put it in other words: what is Wayland's solution called that does the stuff that RandR does in X?

    I mean, we all saw youtube videos of Wayland (or Weston?) rotating textboxes and windows, right? Is that Wayland's equivalent of RandR? What's it called? How is it different (technologically) from X's approach (RandR)?
    Last edited by mark45; 06-16-2012 at 01:02 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    424

    Default

    It probably doesn't have a name. Why would it necessarily need one?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    680

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mark45 View Post
    That's not my question.
    My question was, to put it in other words: what is Wayland's solution called that does the stuff that RandR does in X?

    I mean, we all saw youtube videos of Wayland (or Weston?) rotating textboxes and windows, right? Is that Wayland's equivalent of RandR? What's it called? How is it different (technologically) from X's approach (RandR)?
    It's simply called "Wayland", as the functionality is part of the core design. If you support Wayland you support the feature, and afaik it's simply to support Wayland then X+RandR, comming from zero implementation.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •