i really hope, his stuff like this will get adopted
Phoronix: FBLOG: A Frame-Buffer Driver Just For Kernel Logs
Appearing this weekend on the Linux kernel mailing list was a new frame-buffer driver with the sole purpose of the "fblog" driver being for showing the kernel logs...
http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTEyMTg
i really hope, his stuff like this will get adopted
VT from my cold dead hands, etc.
If this doesn't kill the VT from the kernel, does this still have any advantages when living side-by-side with VT in the kernel?
What advantages does this have?
Does this accept just plain text, or does it also do ANSI coloring and stuff like that?
No, really, what's the point of this? I thought all the ADHD C programmers were busy making init less reliable. What gives?
Why name it fblog and kmscon?
Why not fblog, fbcon or kmslog, kmscon?
Hey, think if someone make a console with HTML and CSS instead of ANSI / VT220?![]()
The console belongs in the kernel. I want to be able to type even under memory pressure/swap storm.