BFS won't be adopted because Con is having argument with the mainline developer. Also, I have found a designing problem that BFS has, is the starvation of sleep task. They can't be scheduled as fair as the cpu-intensive task and as you said, will cause hickup. For example there are 6 task running and there nice value is 0. Five of them are while1 and the remain one is X. All of them should get 16.666% of cpu time. In fact X cannot get 16.666% of cpu time correctly.
Originally Posted by kernelOfTruth
Last edited by 3766691; 07-12-2012 at 09:52 AM.