Linux On The 2012 MacBook Air, MacBook Pro?
Phoronix: Linux On The 2012 MacBook Air, MacBook Pro?
Since yesterday's keynote at the beginning of Apple's WWDC event where they announced several new MacBook products, I've received a number of emails asking about the Linux support for these 2012 MacBook Air models and the next-generation MacBook Pro...
Get the new Retina MBP. There's nothing like it. It's quite possibly the best laptop in the world.
Just don't forget about Linux once you have it (you'll be tempted).
Since the announcement yesterday i am really curious to find out how the FOSS desktop environments perform in high resolution displays.
I've been using the Dell U2711 monitor with 2560x1440 native resolution on Linux for quite a while now---and it's simply awesome. So much screen real estate. I've never regretted the purchase, not even for a moment.
In my opinion the existing desktops work fine (though I tend to keep my mouse acceleration pretty quick). That said, I don't use a bottom-panel taskbar; I tend to alt-tab or use the Expose-style switching. Gnome 3 is decent.
Having such a high resolution screen in a laptop is exciting. I'm sorely tempted to try it out :)
Yes but in the apple display you have approximately the same (higher to be exact) resolution in 15.4 inches instead of 27.
Originally Posted by Kayden
Linux + Apple Hardware == Huge Waste of money.
I wouldn't mind somebody trying it to see what happens, but really it's a terrible idea to purchase a Macbook with the expectation that you are going to run Linux on it.
Dual boot, fine. But get a Mac to primarily run OS X.
Apple doesn't actually manufacture these things. Including the display. It's all contracted out to other companies which produce laptops and components to many other companies. Just wait until somebody starts advertising a Linux compatible device with similar resolution and you will get pretty much the same thing.
The iMac retina displays are speculated to be:
Originally Posted by 89c51
20" @ 2*1920x1080 = 3840x2160
27" @ 2*2560x1440 = 5120x2880
While I don't expect these displays will appear in the 2012 refresh (if there even is one), they are certainly welcome candidates for 2013. I'd pay an extra $1000 for a 27" retina display over a stock one. I doubt I'd pay more than $4000 for an iMac though, unless Apple bought me a lobster dinner and couple drinks first.
retina + slackware + wayland = ftw!
Previous time you compare nVidia GPU, this time it will be nVidia Optimus. So in OS X you will get nVidia GPU acceleration, but in Linux - only Intel (Bumblebee probably not support this new hardware yet).
Originally Posted by phoronix
I can predict results now - without disabling nVidia GPU it will be waste of battery.
Originally Posted by phoronix
Last edited by RussianNeuroMancer; 06-12-2012 at 11:54 PM.
I find it amazing nobody sees the elephant in the room: Linux desktops lack any sensible approach to resolution independence. The problem is not if graphics drivers will be able to cope with Macbook Pro's millions of pixels (of course they will), but if the framework will understand it's a 220 ppi display and behave accordingly, i.e., not display microscopic fonts and icons, but scale them correctly so they use all those extra pixels to show more detail.
I've been advocating for resolution independence in GTK+ for many years now, but the team is having too much fun toying around with their whimsical ideas of usability. Meanwhile, both Apple and Microsoft seem to have been addressing hi-ppi screens in recent years. We'll soon see the fruits of that effort on the proprietary side in upcoming versions of OS X and Windows. Free software will be behind, once again, and I'm afraid it will for many years, since nobody seems to be caring for this. That's almost ten years after the first bug reports about the issue. The lack of professionalism in desktop Linux keeps astonishing me.
Now go ahead and start a series of benchmarks to see how fast the MBP screen is filled on Linux. Like that matters at all.