Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: GRUB 2.00 Boot-Loader Officially Released

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,235

    Default GRUB 2.00 Boot-Loader Officially Released

    Phoronix: GRUB 2.00 Boot-Loader Officially Released

    This morning I wrote that the official GRUB 2.00 release was imminent but little did I know that it would be released just 12 hours later. After being in development for more than a decade, the GRUB 2.00 boot-loader has been officially released...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTEyODc

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,607

    Default

    That was really fast after rc1. I hope debian puts it in wheezy before the freeze. 1.99 is however so extremely patched (over 22 package updates) that i don't know if that happens. But at least in experimental it should be.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    1,988

    Default Architectures

    Nice with added Itanium and MIPS support.
    Would it be possible for it to get ARM and SPARC support in the future?

    It already have x86 and POWER. But lacks Alpha and HP-PA.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    4,973

    Default

    Now that's a nice feature list if any. About the only thing I'd wish was added is eltorito support, so that grub2 could boot any arbitrary CD on computers where the bios can't. (SBM doesn't work everywhere, and it would also be nicer if grub could do it natively).

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Connecticut,USA
    Posts
    952

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by curaga View Post
    Now that's a nice feature list if any. About the only thing I'd wish was added is eltorito support, so that grub2 could boot any arbitrary CD on computers where the bios can't. (SBM doesn't work everywhere, and it would also be nicer if grub could do it natively).
    Sounds like a curious omission as well as booting a USB stick on such bios's that can't handle booting from USB, which will be a boon for those with really old (pre 2000) hardware that generally can't boot off CD's and USB sticks.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,607

    Default

    use plopbt in that case.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    205

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by uid313 View Post
    Nice with added Itanium and MIPS support.
    Would it be possible for it to get ARM and SPARC support in the future?

    It already have x86 and POWER. But lacks Alpha and HP-PA.
    I always wondered about why Grub didn't support more architectures...

    And well, would this mean Grub and Coreboot projects would converge some day and become one? Of course divided in two parts, depending on the avaibility to modify the bios on your hardware.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    4,973

    Default

    What'd be the advantage of grub on ARM? Everyone ships a customized uboot anyway, tailored to init their specific chips, these changes wouldn't likely be accepted (or even sent) to grub. This would mean grub would be a chainloaded bootloader, thus making for a slower boot.

    Yeah, it would present a menu, possibly pretty graphics, and support more file systems. But none of those seems particularly compelling on the typical ARM device.

    (It might be that nowadays u-boot can do a menu. I'm not up to the latest info)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •