Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 66

Thread: AMD Catalyst 12.6 For Linux Disappoints

  1. #21
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    16

    Default

    I wonder whether they improved the OpenCL compiler for the 7970. To sad I removed it from my system yesterday and will have to wait till Monday with testing.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,676

    Default

    That driver is a good example of a very bad fglrx driver. Compared to 12-6 beta there was 0 difference:

    a) same pci ids
    b) no kernel 3.4+ support
    c) crashes with debian xserver 1.12

    So what on earth was fixed? Definitely nothing that i test...

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    87

    Default no kernel 3.4.x support

    I just wanted to confirm there is _no_ 3.4.x support
    I had to patch two files to make it work.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    684

    Default

    [QUOTE=Altix;271994
    BTW, ATi have had crap drivers under WinNT kernels for years too, what their excuse there too? (rhetorical, I don't actually care - I just want a product that works for ~1.5 year before it goes in the bin and I get the next shinny one, particularly GPU's)[/QUOTE]

    I've never had problems with ati drivers under windows, I've got a 6950 working great on my gaming desktop. I remember when I ran vista I switched to an ati x1950 because nvidia's drivers were giving me so much problems.

    On the linux sides I've definitely had bugginess with catalyst. The OSS drivers were quite stable for me, but performance isn't quite there yet (but its decent for basic usage/compositing) and power management is a joke, which is the main issue with them right now IMO. If the OSS ati drivers had decent power management, I would have gladly kept using linux with ati, but I was forced to get a new laptop with intel graphics to get halfway decent battery life and temps. I will be sticking with intel for the foreseeable future, they seem to be the only ones that PROPERLY support linux with good official oss drivers (atom excluded).

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    38

    Default no issues here

    Quote Originally Posted by Kano View Post
    That driver is a good example of a very bad fglrx driver. Compared to 12-6 beta there was 0 difference:

    a) same pci ids
    b) no kernel 3.4+ support
    c) crashes with debian xserver 1.12

    So what on earth was fixed? Definitely nothing that i test...
    on the arch linux side I am running Kernel 3.4.3 kernel with xserver 1.12 with zero issues

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    412

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Detructor View Post
    when? I'm using ATI/AMD cards and drivers since 2003 and their stuff always worked (aside from that one card that decided it would be a wise decision to stop spinning the fan)
    Quote Originally Posted by bwat47 View Post
    I've never had problems with ati drivers under windows, I've got a 6950 working great on my gaming desktop. I remember when I ran vista I switched to an ati x1950 because nvidia's drivers were giving me so much problems.
    WinNT is way older. Here's a german post from 1999 showing issues with ATi GPUs + realtek network chips: http://forum.chip.de/windows-alte-ve...html#post22341
    let me try to translate it for you:
    Michael Beylich wrote:
    > I can't install the ATI Rage 128 at my NT-Machine. Are there some tricks? I can try what I want, the machine won't go above 60 Hz at 800x600.

    Hi !
    Do you have a network card installed -- maybe with a realtek chip?
    There are many problems...
    If you got such a card write to me:

    [email removed]
    I think you'll find more issues if you search in the real NT days, so before Windows 2000.

    But @Altix ATi != AMD. All in all it seems like the driver(s) improved since AMD bought ATi.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,676

    Default

    @xgt001

    i dont use arch.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xgt001 View Post
    on the arch linux side I am running Kernel 3.4.3 kernel with xserver 1.12 with zero issues
    I was unable to get the Catalyst 12.6 beta work with neither kernel 3.4.x nor XServer 1.12 on Ubuntu 12.04. Worked acceptably with 3.3.x and 1.11, though.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    44

    Default

    TobiSGD what kernel are you running?

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    205

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jvillain View Post
    TobiSGD what kernel are you running?
    Currently I am back to Slackware 13.37 with the 2.6.37.6 kernel, I had the same problems with 2.6.32 from Debian and the Slackware kernels 2.6.38, 3.2.7 and 3.2.13.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •