Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: VIA Kernel Mode-Setting Code Might Merge Soon

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,646

    Default VIA Kernel Mode-Setting Code Might Merge Soon

    Phoronix: VIA Kernel Mode-Setting Code Might Merge Soon

    It looks like the VIA kernel mode-setting (KMS) code may soon go mainline...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTEzMDU

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    781

    Default

    The twelve VIA linux users around the world are jumping with joy.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    in front of my box :p
    Posts
    785

    Default

    Well, I'll do that as soon as I can use it. Though most of my old CLE266 devices are already falling apart. Maybe my miniITX CN700 will get a share from the KMS cake one day.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mark45 View Post
    The twelve VIA linux users around the world are jumping with joy.
    Hey now, we are at least fifteen out there.

    On a more serious note; I don't know if I even care any more. I own three VIA mini-itx board. I bought them well before Atom was on the marked so there wasn't many alternatives at the time in that form factor. Funny thing is that I initially thought these boards would have awesome Linux support and didn't even bother to check. I certainly got wiser.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    in front of my box :p
    Posts
    785

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by doctoren View Post
    ...I bought them well before Atom was on the marked so there wasn't many alternatives at the time in that form factor. Funny thing is that I initially thought these boards would have awesome Linux support and didn't even bother to check. I certainly got wiser.
    Me too. But initially they had basically a fairly good Linux support, and you could drive about everything with free drivers, normally these were CPU including this padlock crypto engine, chipset with storage, basic I/O, LAN, sound and even the GPU seemed to work. Well sometimes the MPEG2 acceleration seemed to be better in Linux than Windows (in terms of CPU usage) but then I can't remember which driver they were using.
    xf86-video-via was at that time from Luc, later there was unichrome and finally openchrome which I use still since the others went down. Also used vesa but never the proprietary crapthing. And then the frambuffer driver from the kernel didn't really go well with the X part. Nothing that was in mesa ever really worked.
    Well, besides the GPU part one can still use the boards fairly well and the GPU just for simple 2D things.

    But then, as another reason:
    At that time intel and AMD were driving a crazy race of MHz, wasting power and producing heat and thus noise. VIA came in with the C3 and later C7 and these small form factor low energy, passively cooled things looked like the perfect niche market. HTPC and file servers. Would have been great if VIA had given more support. Now intel is having atom and AMD has Z, C and E series covering that area with competitive power consumption, better drivers, features and stability. If this damn UVD issue wasn't there... it would be perfect.

    But I keep my hardware normally as long as possible unless it really wasted power but I don't own that kind of stuff anymore. So I'll also have my C7 for quite some time I guess and maybe one day it'll be more than a text console computer with minimal X capacities.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,070

    Default

    Don't those older chips have docs out? http://www.x.org/docs/via/

    Here's your chance to fame, go help Simmons

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    in front of my box :p
    Posts
    785

    Default

    1st I heard that docs were never complete. and 2nd: Hey, I hack specific molecules not code.
    I wish I could also do the latter.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    418

    Default

    I always wonder, if VIA would be still sinking so badly, if they would have released proper support ages ago. They could have been the mediacenter kings! I guess

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    in front of my box :p
    Posts
    785

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oliver View Post
    They could have been the mediacenter kings!
    Quite sure. Okay, others would also have come to the market but they would've had their niche and their fanclub. The product basically would've been great, if the had better support (GPU and all related to it) and if they had sold them passively cooled from the beginning (instead they put loud cheapo fans on their Epia boards). But now in terms of power consumtion all others are quite on par and better with drivers, regardless if they're nv, intel or ati-AMD. And then from the "lower end" ARM stuff is coming, though they have the same horrible GPU problems.

    But yes, they would've been the first to set their foot there and could have established a reasonable place for them in the market.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    118

    Default

    I stopped caring about Via when I donated the last of my Socket 7 systems to a recycling center.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •