I never claimed this would happen, only that RH would be in the best position for this sort of thing. Aside from that, it really isn't that far from what they do. Obviously their main source of income is support for RHEL along with upselling of their virt stack and JBoss, but they've really already done the hard work needed for this sort of thing with RHEL. The big reason it wouldn't happen is the vast increase in user support they would have to accomodate, and that, along with the small fee I supposed, would prevent this from happening.
Lastly, as I said, you can ask Dave Airlie but I'm fairly certain they back-port the graphic stack as much as possible, and, really, that isn't the issue here since these would be running the blobs for max performance otherwise you'd have a hard time convincing window's gamers to switch.
Yes, it is. Small comparison Catalyst vs Open source (my own timedemo):![]()
Yes, it is. Ask Google (there is a moderation failutere on Phoronix:-) for wkupiesila r600g vs catalyst and use Google Translate for more info. I used my custom demo instead PTS.
Keep in mind there are millions of Ubuntu users who doesn't have such problems. There's always some fault tolerance when comes to hardware and it seems Ubuntu is in the best position to become the most error prone distribution. It will be great to have Ubuntu certified hardware to make users sure they won't get into such problems. Btw. your problem seems to be more likely Unity or graphic driver issue.
http://wkupiesila.blogspot.gr/2012/0...ife-2wine.html
You can post links after a few posts (don't know the exact number). I believe this is what you wanted to link.![]()