Page 8 of 10 FirstFirst ... 678910 LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 95

Thread: Gabe Newell Showing Valve On Linux To Partners

  1. #71
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    839

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kamikaze View Post
    RedHat's core business is support, targeted at companies. While it would be nice for them to release a version of RHEL for gaming, it just wouldn't happen - it's too far removed from what they do. The best you'd get is a Fedora spin for gaming that would be mostly community maintained anyway.

    entropy's post is dead on the money too. Valve would probably want to target a more recent kernel and graphics stack then what RHEL would offer. Larabel makes it sound like they're interested in targeting some of the open source driver stack aswell (e.g. the article hinting that Valve would want to get rid of the S3TC patent issue).
    I never claimed this would happen, only that RH would be in the best position for this sort of thing. Aside from that, it really isn't that far from what they do. Obviously their main source of income is support for RHEL along with upselling of their virt stack and JBoss, but they've really already done the hard work needed for this sort of thing with RHEL. The big reason it wouldn't happen is the vast increase in user support they would have to accomodate, and that, along with the small fee I supposed, would prevent this from happening.
    Lastly, as I said, you can ask Dave Airlie but I'm fairly certain they back-port the graphic stack as much as possible, and, really, that isn't the issue here since these would be running the blobs for max performance otherwise you'd have a hard time convincing window's gamers to switch.

  2. #72
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    102

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hamish Wilson View Post
    Considering I can play Trine 2 and Amnesia fine with my (now out of date) graphics stack on Fedora 16 with R600g and a Radeon HD 4670, I somehow doubt that Valve's catalogue will put that much more of a strain on it, especially it's back catalogue. It is not like Source is all that graphically advanced an engine anymore, when compared to what is available now.
    Uh, It seems that moderator doesn't like links in posts... but I benchmarked 6670 in Half-life 2 @ 1920x1080 (highest settings without AA and AF) and got about 60 fps using R600g.

  3. #73
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    734

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwahoo View Post
    Uh, It seems that moderator doesn't like links in posts... but I benchmarked 6670 in Half-life 2 @ 1920x1080 (highest settings without AA and AF) and got about 60 fps using R600g.
    Cool, is that with the open source drivers?

  4. #74
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    102

    Default

    Yes, it is. Small comparison Catalyst vs Open source (my own timedemo):

  5. #75
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    102

    Default

    Yes, it is. Ask Google (there is a moderation failutere on Phoronix:-) for wkupiesila r600g vs catalyst and use Google Translate for more info. I used my custom demo instead PTS.

  6. #76
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,277

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by liam View Post
    Again, if you go with a truly stable distro like a RHEL clone, these problems are substantially lessened. Now, what could be interesting is if Red Hat offered a Gamer Edition devoid of the certifications that RHEL has (and a major source of the cost of RHEL) and configured for an ideal gamer experience (perhaps with their real time messaging kernel). I would pay a reasonable fee for that, and companies have a very slow moving target to their wares.
    One more thing: by creating a distro that is primarily for gaming (but is obviously still general purpose), it might incentivize people to move from Windows. Also, the installed base of Linux is not so great, or monolithic, that it makes sense targeting a single distro right now, especially since stability problems would still exist.
    What i was trying to point out is not the lack of stability but the lack of convenience.

  7. #77

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by johnc View Post
    Perhaps the tone of my post was a bit on the snarky side -- I guess my frustration cup hath runneth over recently. But I think it is valid to say that Linux is not ready for gaming enthusiasts (Valve's primary market), unless those gamers happen to be familiar with all the idiosyncrasies of Linux (which is a tiny user base to begin with -- Venn diagram and all).

    You mentioned the LTS... Shortly after I installed it, a new kernel was pushed out. Install... Reboot... Blinking cursor. Okay, I know what's wrong there (since I'm quite familiar with the problem), and yes, this isn't directly of Valve's concern. But if Valve is looking to move their customers from Windows to Linux (perhaps to avoid the Windows app store), then we can all be sure that newcomers are not going to tolerate blinking-cursors-on-reboot.

    While I can handle these kinds of quirks quite easily, I have to admit that even I get frustrated at times... When I'm just looking to do X but a roadblock is thrown up and I have to waste my time fixing something before I can get the job done.

    I'm just saying that what we have currently is nowhere near good enough for anything other than hacker and hobbyist adoption... and playing ostrich does not make any of the problems go away.
    Keep in mind there are millions of Ubuntu users who doesn't have such problems. There's always some fault tolerance when comes to hardware and it seems Ubuntu is in the best position to become the most error prone distribution. It will be great to have Ubuntu certified hardware to make users sure they won't get into such problems. Btw. your problem seems to be more likely Unity or graphic driver issue.

  8. #78
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    734

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwahoo View Post
    Yes, it is. Ask Google (there is a moderation failutere on Phoronix:-) for wkupiesila r600g vs catalyst and use Google Translate for more info. I used my custom demo instead PTS.
    Very cool, I'm very happy to see open source drivers catching up and/or getting better than proprietary blobs. I hope this trend will only continue.

    Hats off / kudos to the FOSS developers!
    Last edited by asdx; 07-04-2012 at 04:30 AM.

  9. #79

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by liam View Post
    If valve is smart, they'll use rhel as the supported target. That's really the only option. No one other linux distribution, aside from, perhaps, Debian, has their QA resources. To be clear, rhel means rhel clones including centis, scientific linux and oracle's linux.
    No, because Ubuntu is the most popular desktop distribution. It's also much easier to install codecs and proprietary drivers in Ubuntu. Valve's decision to support Ubuntu automatically means it will get much more testing.

  10. #80
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,277

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwahoo View Post
    Yes, it is. Ask Google (there is a moderation failutere on Phoronix:-) for wkupiesila r600g vs catalyst and use Google Translate for more info. I used my custom demo instead PTS.
    http://wkupiesila.blogspot.gr/2012/0...ife-2wine.html

    You can post links after a few posts (don't know the exact number). I believe this is what you wanted to link.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •