Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 34 of 34

Thread: Ubuntu Still Aims For Wayland System Compositor

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    81

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by asdx View Post
    STFU bitch. Fuck off.
    Someone pee in your cheerios? Your behavior is uncalled for, and is definitly unwanted. You should take your own advice, and not click that "Submit Reply" button until you have pulled your head out of your ass first.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    722

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sandain View Post
    Someone pee in your cheerios? Your behavior is uncalled for, and is definitly unwanted. You should take your own advice, and not click that "Submit Reply" button until you have pulled your head out of your ass first.
    Don't be alarmed. Every one of his posts are like that. He just does a cut and paste.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    209

    Default

    Back on topic...

    I think Wayland cannot come early enough, but at the same time, nothing is ready. Canonical doesn't even work on Wayland, so how can they target it at all? They're just waiting for everything to be magically handed to them based on their deadlines? LOL!

    This a case of Canonical-thinks-the-Linux-world-revolves-around-them, and I'm unamused. Surely the mass exodus to Mint hasn't gone completely unnoticed... and I'd think the solution isn't to BREAK EVERYTHING, but start giving your userbase what they want.

    The last 8 years has seen alot of "Okay, we've got a successful project. Now lets ignore our userbase and go off and do our own thing, regardless of community feedback." AmaroK, Gnome, KDE, Ubuntu.... the tablets all these distros think they MUST support but don't actually run on? The new audio backends that woo developers over somehow but don't actually support anything? The trashing of existing features that users love? Well, why not take the next step and throw EVERYTHING THAT WORKS into the garbage before its all ready. Sounds exactly like what Canonical would do next, based on their track record...

  4. #34
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    539

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JanC View Post
    Isn't that an issue with the nvidia binary blob?
    I have that issue using intel. Its only an issue in ubuntu too, fedora's boot looks great the whole way through.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •