Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32

Thread: Fedora 18 Will Get 256 Color Terminals

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,782

    Default Fedora 18 Will Get 256 Color Terminals

    Phoronix: Fedora 18 Will Get 256 Color Terminals

    At today's FESCo meeting it was approved that Fedora 18 will aim for 256-color terminal support by default...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTEzNjQ

  2. #2

    Default Boring.

    Terminals are so 80's. Sure, they do and always will have their uses, but user interfaces are simply the superior way of doing things. Linux isn't intended to be confined to geeks, it actually has a future.

    Overall, I'm not very enthused about F18. F17 had a ton of features that were immediately beneficial to a user, but most of the stuff in 18 seems to be plumbing stuff, or something like this for the terminal.

    OTOH, I'm sure that many of these F18 features will make F19 fantastic.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    772

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by halfmanhalfamazing View Post
    Terminals are so 80's.
    Or, as Ron Minnich put it, "Type 'stty' at an xterm and tell me why a window has a baud rate. [...] Wow, how advanced. 1,000,000 times the performance and there's still an ASR-33 in the middle". Of course, he was questioning the usefulness of pretending that you're talking to a terminal, not the usefulness of textual interfaces generally.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    63

    Default Big deal?

    This seems rather irrelevant when we don't even have AMD/NVIDIA graphics drivers that can perform even close to Windows. Forget about the terminal colors and focus on the #1 lacking area for Linux : proper graphics acceleration.

  5. #5

    Default

    Gentoo has had this for years.

    Quote Originally Posted by enfocomp View Post
    This seems rather irrelevant when we don't even have AMD/NVIDIA graphics drivers that can perform even close to Windows. Forget about the terminal colors and focus on the #1 lacking area for Linux : proper graphics acceleration.
    What are you doing to give us proper graphics acceleration?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    .ca
    Posts
    402

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by halfmanhalfamazing View Post
    Terminals are so 80's. Sure, they do and always will have their uses, but user interfaces are simply the superior way of doing things.
    Terminals ARE user interfaces. And if you mean "graphical user interfaces", no, pointing at graphical representations of things is caveman technology and generally a far inferior method of communication compared to language.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    404

    Default

    I say this every time the topic comes up: for tasks that are not inherently visual, a graphical user interface is likely to be far more arcane and difficult to use than a well-designed text interface. There is, after all a reason we have a language based on logical semantic (symbolic) structure and not pictography or imitative sounds.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Rural Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,030

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by halfmanhalfamazing View Post
    Overall, I'm not very enthused about F18. F17 had a ton of features that were immediately beneficial to a user, but most of the stuff in 18 seems to be plumbing stuff, or something like this for the terminal.
    While I am quite pleased with how Fedora 17 turned out I am actually skipping it in favour of Fedora 18. Mostly looking forward to Xfce 4.10 and Mesa 8.1, plus any other graphical enhancements that are in the pipeline.

    Quote Originally Posted by enfocomp View Post
    This seems rather irrelevant when we don't even have AMD/NVIDIA graphics drivers that can perform even close to Windows. Forget about the terminal colors and focus on the #1 lacking area for Linux : proper graphics acceleration.
    Once again a simple answer to an all together all to prevalent misconception: this is not an either or thing, and one does not take away effort from the other. One developer can not take on all problems. Some can work on graphics and others can work on other things. It is amazing how hard this can be for some people to grasp.

    Quote Originally Posted by TechMage89 View Post
    I say this every time the topic comes up: for tasks that are not inherently visual, a graphical user interface is likely to be far more arcane and difficult to use than a well-designed text interface. There is, after all a reason we have a language based on logical semantic (symbolic) structure and not pictography or imitative sounds.
    Well said.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    205

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by halfmanhalfamazing View Post
    Terminals are so 80's. Sure, they do and always will have their uses, but user interfaces are simply the superior way of doing things.
    http://www.catb.org/~esr//writings/u...rogrammer.html

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    3

    Default

    I doubt it will ship Perl 5.6 but 5.16.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •