Results 1 to 10 of 34

Thread: Solaris 11 Struggles Against Linux Distributions

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,130

    Default Solaris 11 Struggles Against Linux Distributions

    Phoronix: Solaris 11 Struggles Against Linux Distributions

    For some interesting benchmarks to share before the start of the weekend, here's some recent test results conducted at Phoronix that's comparing Oracle Solaris 11 Express, Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, CentOS 6.2, Debian GNU/kFreeBSD Wheezy, and Fedora 17.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=17607

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,107

    Default Linux didn't kill Solaris

    Solaris struggles against Linux, but it wasn't Linux that killed Solaris - it was Oracle.

    Solaris could stand by its own merit. It was backed by a huge technology company (Sun Microsystems), it had the world's most advanced file system, it had great technology such as DTrace, etc.
    It was active and had great community participation through OpenSolaris.

    Sun was highly regarded in the technical community due to being a huge supporter of open source. Java, OpenSolaris, NetBeans, OpenOffice, VirtualBox and lots of other software. Not to mention open source hardware through the OpenSPARC project.

    Then Oracle comes a long, buys Sun and manages to fuck every single thing up.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Creve Coeur, Missouri
    Posts
    402

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by uid313 View Post
    Then Oracle comes a long, buys Sun and manages to fuck every single thing up.
    +sideways fucking 8

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by uid313 View Post
    Solaris struggles against Linux, but it wasn't Linux that killed Solaris - it was Oracle.
    No, it was Linux. This is the reason why SUN is dead. Oracle just bought a dead horse, but what's more important they were mainly interested in java not in Solaris.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    44

    Default

    Solaris struggles against Linux, but it wasn't Linux that killed Solaris - it was Oracle.
    Really? The Solaris guys are still in denial? Go take a look at the stock price graphs. Sun was over long before Oracle came along. Not that I am defending Oracle in any way or form.

    The story seems to tie performance to stricktly to the compiler with out taking any thing else into consideration. It would also help if we knew what each of the tests was actually testing.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jvillain View Post
    The story seems to tie performance to stricktly to the compiler with out taking any thing else into consideration. It would also help if we knew what each of the tests was actually testing.
    This is true. For instance, the FreeBSD kernel in Debian is compiled with -O1, which hurts performance.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Owatonna, Minnesota, USA
    Posts
    98

    Default

    I still wonder from time to time what would've happened if the OpenSolaris code had been released as GPLv3 as some rumors had speculated.
    Solaris had some interesting tech in it, but overall it was very hardware-limited. You had to basically buy hardware for it. Linux was already miles ahead of it in that regard.

    Any chance Solaris had to shine is long gone. Oracle was just the final nail in the coffin.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ryao View Post
    This is true. For instance, the FreeBSD kernel in Debian is compiled with -O1, which hurts performance.
    And kfreebsd in FreeBSD is optimized with what flag?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,559

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kraftman View Post
    No, it was Linux. This is the reason why SUN is dead.
    Well, Intel played the largest role.

    It's not like customers were buying Solaris.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •