Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32

Thread: Mesa's Rate Of Git Development Is Slowing

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,629

    Default Mesa's Rate Of Git Development Is Slowing

    Phoronix: Mesa's Rate Of Git Development Is Slowing

    Based upon the latest Git statistics, the rate of Mesa's development commits has been slowing down. There's also some other interesting numbers to share...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTEyNjI

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    944

    Default

    Big fat "Phoronix" label that screws the image completely.
    Why not use a watermark (transparent) image instead.

  3. #3

    Default

    Isn't it caused just by cutting out old cruft and using more modern and simpler gallium architecture?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,193

    Default Why is this happening?

    This is terrible. Why is this happening?
    Or is there something misleading here?

    Mesa needs more work than ever. We need OpenGL 4.2 compliance, proper power management and re-clocking support.

    Anything went wrong?
    Why aren't there more contributors?
    Why aren't the contributors more active?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    366

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by uid313 View Post
    This is terrible. Why is this happening?
    Or is there something misleading here?

    Mesa needs more work than ever. We need OpenGL 4.2 compliance, proper power management and re-clocking support.

    Anything went wrong?
    Why aren't there more contributors?
    Why aren't the contributors more active?
    Simple: As any software reaches maturity, the number of corresponding changes decreases. I see nothing too surprising in that graph: You have a startup period, a rapid increase in development, and now you begin to see the slowdown that accompanies mostly-mature software projects.

    Then again, are you REALLY going to try and determine the "health" of software by the number of changes?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Madison, WI, USA
    Posts
    884

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by uid313 View Post
    Mesa needs more work than ever. We need OpenGL 4.2 compliance, proper power management and re-clocking support.
    Of the 3 things listed, only one of them should be done in the Mesa project. Power Management and Re-Clocking support should be handled in the kernel, not in a user-space 3D graphics library.

    As another poster mentioned, things are maturing, which means that a large amount of the needed code and refactoring has already been done. More features are still obviously needed, but now there's hard-to-find bugs which take a lot of time to diagnose, and often only take a few lines of changed code to fix. New extensions, GLSL versions, profiles, state trackers, new drivers, and other things will still require additional new code, but hopefully the Gallium3D architecture will reduce the amount of new code required for new drivers and state trackers.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    224

    Default

    Is Valve looking for people to contribute to Mesa directly?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,193

    Default Contribute

    Could not find a roadmap.

    But if you want to contribute:
    http://www.mesa3d.org/helpwanted.html
    Join mailing list: http://www.mesa3d.org/lists.html
    Read OpenGL documentation: http://www.opengl.org/documentation/

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,322

    Default

    I haven't seen commits from Marek Olsak lately :\
    I hope he's working on something major (maybe Southern Islands support).

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    152

    Default

    Hey Michael,

    I would like to see an article about the current status of the Gallium3D framework. I do not mean benchmarks. I mean commentary from the developers from radeon, nouveaou, and vmware. Also I would like read an in depth analysis of the architectual differencies between the classic and the gallium drivers.

    Gallium3D promissed a lot. Has it delivered? Have we reached the reuse greatness? What are the drawbacks? etc.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •