Page 4 of 11 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 104

Thread: So who are these douches that took down the nvnews site?

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,618

    Default

    Troll feeding time.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    290

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RealNC View Post
    Troll feeding time.
    Yeah, but sometimes it's fun.

    Notice how he says he could "keep going", but he couldn't even come up with four points (the last one is a repeat of the first one)?

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    729

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gusar View Post
    Yeah, but sometimes it's fun.

    Notice how he says he could "keep going", but he couldn't even come up with four points (the last one is a repeat of the first one)?
    I've already provided some points, but let's keep going:


    1. Lack of KMS in the blob.
    2. Reinventing components that already exist (GEM, DRI, etc). Thus being hostile to developers.
    3. Refusing to provide specifications for nouveau developers. Thus, again, being hostile to developers.


    Want me to keep going?
    Last edited by asdx; 07-21-2012 at 03:59 PM.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    729

    Default

    nvnews is still down, hahaha

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    290

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by asdx View Post
    [*]Lack of KMS in the blob.
    The most use Linux gets is either X (desktops and workstations), or being ssh'd into a server. Those few who actively spend time on a local console can use Intel or AMD graphics, or even Nvidia graphics with nouveau, if they want a high-res console.

    So the "damage" from the blob not using KMS is... ?

    Quote Originally Posted by asdx View Post
    [*]Reinventing components that already exist (GEM, DRI, etc).
    Intel "reinvented the wheel" when they created GEM, at a time TTM already existed. And they don't use Gallium. OMG, Intel does "damage" to Linux!!! Those bastards!

    Hmm, should I mention that Nvidia had accelerated indirect rendering well before the open drivers had AIGLX? And that they had redirected direct rendering well before open drivers had DRI2? Or that they had in-kernel memory management before either TTM or GEM existed? Nah...

    Quote Originally Posted by asdx View Post
    [*]Refusing to provide specifications for nouveau developers.
    You already said that. Twice. So this makes three now.

    Quote Originally Posted by asdx View Post
    Want me to keep going?
    Of course. And be sure the next list will include "they don't provide specs to nouveau devs", cos you haven't mentioned that yet
    Last edited by Gusar; 07-21-2012 at 04:32 PM.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    113

    Default

    He probably doesn't even drive because the cars aren't opensource.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    722

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by boast View Post
    He probably doesn't even drive because the cars aren't opensource.
    He probably doesn't drive because he's not old enough.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    729

    Default

    *yawn*

    the shitty nvnews site is still down.

    hahaha

  9. #39
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    722

    Default

    Which is more likely to happen... the nvnews site is restored... or asdx de-douchifies himself? Hmmmmm...

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by asdx View Post
    *yawn*

    the shitty nvnews site is still down.

    hahaha
    Asdx, your intentions are saint, but your religious icons perform sins on a monthly basis.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •